Don't emit CA1704 for interface implementations

[Applesauce314]

updates CA1704 as described in #6472.
if the method a parameter is part of is an interface implementation or an override, CA1704 is not emitted. This prevents warnings/errors that cannot be fixed if CA1725 is also active.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #6473 (b48b645) into main (23b0f3d) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 99.70%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #6473    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   96.40%   96.41%            
========================================
  Files        1371     1371            
  Lines      318939   319253   +314     
  Branches    10265    10278    +13     
========================================
+ Hits       307480   307795   +315     
+ Misses       9002     9000     -2     
- Partials     2457     2458     +1     

[Youssef1313]

Can you add a test for explicit interface implementation?

[Youssef1313]

Thanks @Applesauce314. This LGTM 🎉

[Applesauce314]

Can you add a test for explicit interface implementation?

Done

[Applesauce314]

Final state:
Does not emit diagnostic if parameter is part of a member implementation that is an implicit or explicit interface implementation, or an override of a base member, unless the parameter is misspelled and does not match the name in any of the base or interface definitions.