lib: use time_t_max for empty datetime #2749
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In Mu::parse_date_time, when provided with an empty string, return
time_t_max instead of G_MAXINT64. For systems with a 64-bit time_t, there
is no difference. With a 32-bit time_t it caused a test to fail:
not ok /utils/date-basic - ERROR:../mu-1.12.4/lib/utils/tests/test-utils.cc:92
void test_date_basic(): assertion failed
(parse_date_time(std::get<0>(test), std::get<1>(test)).value_or(-1)
== std::get<2>(test)): (18446744073709551615 == 2147483647)
This edge case probably only affected the test, as when other parts of
the application call parse_date_time (e.g. mu-server.cc and
mu-query-processor.cc), they check if the input string is empty first.
|
Makes sense. Merged, thanks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In Mu::parse_date_time, when provided with an empty string, return time_t_max instead of G_MAXINT64. For systems with a 64-bit time_t, there is no difference. With a 32-bit time_t it caused a test to fail:
This edge case probably only affected the test, as when other parts of the application call parse_date_time (e.g. mu-server.cc and mu-query-processor.cc), they check if the input string is empty first.