Specify additional task outputs #1237
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks very much!
That would be very welcome! Let's discuss that at #554. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi everyone!
In order to optimise the build process in terms of incremental build and enable additional caching possibilities (https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/more_about_tasks.html#sec:up_to_date_checks and https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/build_cache.html#sec:build_cache_enable), I've specified additional task outputs.
Those mainly concern spotbugs set up and maven-plugin build process.
With these changes, incremental build is fully supported for all tasks and spotbugs runs are fully cached as well.
Additional caching can also be done for maven-plugin tests, but those changes may involve more extensive build rewrite, so if you're interested, I can create a separate issue about that, so that we can discuss it outside of this PR.
Looking forward to your feedback!
Thanks!