Skip to content

Deadlock in Interceptor #47

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
asmus opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 9 comments
Closed

Deadlock in Interceptor #47

asmus opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 9 comments

Comments

@asmus
Copy link

asmus commented Apr 24, 2013

When calling Method1 on the mock, and Method one is executing Method2 asynchronously and then waiting for Method2 to complete Moq will cause a deadlock due to the interceptor implementation.

public void Intercept(ICallContext invocation)
{

    lock (Mock) // this solves issue #249
    {
        var interceptionContext = new InterceptStrategyContext(Mock
                                                            , targetType
                                                            , invocationLists
                                                            , actualInvocations
                                                            , behavior
                                                            , orderedCalls
                                                            );
        foreach (var strategy in InterceptionStrategies())
        {
            if (InterceptionAction.Stop == strategy.HandleIntercept(invocation, interceptionContext))
            {
                break;
            }
        }
    }
}

The actual method of the Mock will be called unter lock condition. This will cause a deadlock in some cases. Simple TestCase to reproduce the behavior:

public class ClassToMock
{
    AutoResetEvent reset = new AutoResetEvent(false);
    public virtual void M1()
    {
        var task = new TaskFactory().StartNew(M2);
        Thread.Sleep(500);
        reset.Set();
        task.Wait();
    }

    public virtual void M2()
    {
        reset.WaitOne();
    }
}

[TestMethod]
public void TestMock()
{
    var testMock = new Mock<ClassToMock>{CallBase = true};
    testMock.Object.M1(); // <-- This will never return!
    testMock.Verify(x => x.M1());
    testMock.Verify(x => x.M2());
}
@kzu
Copy link
Member

kzu commented Apr 24, 2013

Could this be related to the fix @yonahw contributed in pull #36 ?

@asmus
Copy link
Author

asmus commented Apr 24, 2013

I don´t think so. The InvokeBase Interception strategy is still called under lock conditions and the lock is still made on "Mock". I believe executing the InvokeBase strategy under lock conditions is causing the deadlock. Unfortunately I do not have the time to verify that right now. Maybe I can can try to fix it on the weekend.

@yonahw
Copy link
Contributor

yonahw commented Apr 25, 2013

I didn't have time to run test myself but doesn't seem related on the surface.

@kzu
Copy link
Member

kzu commented Apr 25, 2013

weird thing is that there was no other change related to locking, so I
wonder how could the behavior change so drastically (do we know it's
different than before?)

/kzu

Daniel Cazzulino

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Yonah Wahrhaftig <[email protected]

wrote:

I didn't have time to run test myself but doesn't seem related on the
surface.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/47#issuecomment-17005259
.

@asmus
Copy link
Author

asmus commented Apr 25, 2013

In my opinion this behavior was introduced when fixing issue #3. As far as I can tell (I´m still not so familiar with github) the lock was introduced to resolve the threading issue when calling methods on a mock from different threads in parallel. The lock is just covering to much. It is calling "foreign" code under lock conditions, what always is dangerous. But on the other hand it could very well be that I´m missing something here and I´m completely wrong .... that happens from time to time :)

@kzu
Copy link
Member

kzu commented May 27, 2013

@FelicePollano did you have a chance to look at this?

@FelicePollano
Copy link
Contributor

Full immersion until the end of the month.

 

Felice Pollano
Senior IT Architect & Developer

http://www.felicepollano.com

From: "Daniel Cazzulino" [email protected]
To: "Moq/moq4" [email protected]
Cc: "Felice Pollano" [email protected]
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 08:17:33 -0700
Subject: Re: [moq4] Deadlock in Interceptor (#47)

@FelicePollano did you have a chance to look at this?

—> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@asmus
Copy link
Author

asmus commented May 29, 2013

I thought I have a look at the code and try to fix it. Got the code from gitHub and build the whole thing (VS 2012). But somehow almost all UnitTest are failing with:

System.TypeInitializationException
The type initializer for 'Moq.Mock1' threw an exception. at Moq.Mock1.b__0() in Mock.Generic.cs: line 138
at Moq.PexProtector.Invoke(Action action) in PexProtector.cs: line 56
at Moq.Mock1.InitializeInstance() in Mock.Generic.cs: line 136 at Moq.Mock1.OnGetObject() in Mock.Generic.cs: line 153
at Moq.Mock.GetObject() in Mock.cs: line 152
at Moq.Mock.get_Object() in Mock.cs: line 147
at Moq.Mock1.get_Object() in Mock.Generic.cs: line 131 at Moq.Tests.AsInterfaceFixture.GetMockFromNonAddedInterfaceThrows() in AsInterfaceFixture.cs: line 120 System.TypeInitializationException The type initializer for 'Moq.Proxy.CastleProxyFactory' threw an exception. at Moq.Proxy.CastleProxyFactory..ctor() at Moq.Mock1..cctor() in Mock.Generic.cs: line 54
System.IO.FileLoadException
Could not load file or assembly 'Castle.Core, Version=2.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=407dd0808d44fbdc' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)
at Moq.Proxy.CastleProxyFactory..cctor()

Obviously I miss something here ... any hints?

@MatKubicki
Copy link
Contributor

I've added pull request #68 that fixes this problem, i've used the code asmus attached as test for the fix.

@stakx stakx closed this as completed Jun 3, 2017
@devlooped devlooped locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 7, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants