Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade QLI Installer and use Cal's Qt Mirror for more stable Windows builds #318

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2019

Conversation

nelsonjchen
Copy link

@nelsonjchen nelsonjchen commented May 26, 2019

The default Qt Mirror has been having strange connectivity issues and timeouts. This is causing timeouts and brownouts of Windows builds.

As an alternative, perhaps we should try using a mirror of the Qt repository instead of just Qt's. I've added support to use alternate mirrors to my fork of QLI Installer. (I've opened an issue on that nicer fork to add this feature as well)

From a mirror list, I've picked UC Berkeley's mirror as an alternative since I believe it to be the biggest and most stable alternative mirror to the other commercial or enthusiast mirrors in North America. It's almost government.

This should provide more reliable Windows builds in CI.
@nelsonjchen nelsonjchen changed the title Upgrade QLI Installer and use Cal's Qt Mirror for more Upgrade QLI Installer and use Cal's Qt Mirror for more stable Windows builds May 26, 2019
@AdrianKoshka
Copy link

AdrianKoshka commented May 26, 2019

That's odd, the linux build failed. Otherwise, sounds good to me.

Fetched 17.3 MB in 5s (3,270 kB/s)

E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?
##[error]Bash exited with code '100'.
##[section]Finishing: Install Dependencies

@AdrianKoshka AdrianKoshka added the enhancement New feature or request label May 26, 2019
@nelsonjchen
Copy link
Author

The Linux build needs an ‘apt update’. I’ll make a separate PR for that.

@nelsonjchen
Copy link
Author

Actually, I'll be making a seperate PR for Linux anyway. The dependencies there need to be locked down.

@AdrianKoshka
Copy link

Going to assume this PR is safe to pull in now?

@nelsonjchen
Copy link
Author

nelsonjchen commented May 26, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants