-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CT 1644 node cleanup #6427
Merged
Merged
CT 1644 node cleanup #6427
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
79c66b7
Remove unneeded SQL compilation attributes from SeedNode
gshank 2d155ac
Fix various places that referenced removed attributes
gshank 1b3ef6f
Cleanup a few Unions
gshank 3c12b6c
More formatting in nodes.py
gshank 1cc2093
Mypy passing. Untested.
gshank 01c8cd1
Unit tests working
gshank 6d5420d
use "doc" in documentation unique_ids
gshank 65f72de
update some doc_ids
gshank 9528dba
Fix some artifact tests. Still need previous version.
gshank 0afb58d
Update manifest/v8.json
gshank a4e2a53
Move relation_names to parsing
gshank 868f583
Fix a couple of tests
gshank ed45aef
Update some artifacts. snapshot_seed has wrong schema.
gshank 13e8392
Changie
gshank a27f2d2
Tweak NodeType.Documentation
gshank c7d402f
Put store_failures property in the right place
gshank cc0d558
Fix setting relation_name
gshank File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | ||
kind: Under the Hood | ||
body: Refactor and clean up manifest nodes | ||
time: 2022-12-11T21:42:40.560074-05:00 | ||
custom: | ||
Author: gshank | ||
Issue: "6426" | ||
PR: "6427" |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This error and the check don't match.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They're actually the same thing. Mypy wouldn't let me use ManifestNode in an isinstance check. I'd rather not use ParsedNode in the message, because I think using the superclasses is more confusing...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe just a comment in the code to that effect then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In any case, it's really not a user-facing exception. It should only show up when a developer has made a mistake :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I just want to avoid spending 5 minutes wondering why these don't match next time I'm in there 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment "# Can't use ManifestNode here because of parameterized generics" wasn't enough?