Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make groups integration tests less flaky #965

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024
Merged

Make groups integration tests less flaky #965

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

nkvuong
Copy link
Contributor

@nkvuong nkvuong commented Feb 21, 2024

Changes

  • Fix test_env_or_skip: Skipped & Failed needs to be imported as outcomes from _pytest
  • Parametrize test_group_name_change suites
  • Change validate_migrate_groups to raise NotFound, so flaky tests can be retried

Tests

  • manually tested

@nkvuong nkvuong requested review from a team and larsgeorge-db February 21, 2024 10:52
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c38ff72) 87.49% compared to head (2647f91) 87.51%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #965      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.49%   87.51%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          44       44              
  Lines        5319     5341      +22     
  Branches      949      954       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         4654     4674      +20     
- Misses        450      452       +2     
  Partials      215      215              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nkvuong nkvuong changed the title Fix test_env_or_skip integration test Make groups integration tests less flaky Feb 21, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@nfx nfx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nfx nfx merged commit f7dd57e into main Feb 21, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@nfx nfx deleted the fix/integration-tests branch February 21, 2024 16:08
nfx added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
* Fixed `AnalysisException` in `crawl_tables` task by ignoring the database that is not found ([#970](#970)).
* Fixed `Unknown: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: NoSuchObjectException` in `crawl_grants` task by ignoring the database that is not found ([#967](#967)).
* Fixed ruff config for ruff==2.0 ([#969](#969)).
* Made groups integration tests less flaky ([#965](#965)).
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2024
nfx added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2024
* Fixed `AnalysisException` in `crawl_tables` task by ignoring the
database that is not found
([#970](#970)).
* Fixed `Unknown: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException:
NoSuchObjectException` in `crawl_grants` task by ignoring the database
that is not found
([#967](#967)).
* Fixed ruff config for ruff==2.0
([#969](#969)).
* Made groups integration tests less flaky
([#965](#965)).
dmoore247 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
## Changes
- Fix `test_env_or_skip`: Skipped & Failed needs to be imported as
outcomes from `_pytest`
- Parametrize `test_group_name_change` suites
- Change `validate_migrate_groups` to raise `NotFound`, so flaky tests
can be retried

### Tests
<!-- How is this tested? Please see the checklist below and also
describe any other relevant tests -->

- [x] manually tested
dmoore247 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
* Fixed `AnalysisException` in `crawl_tables` task by ignoring the
database that is not found
([#970](#970)).
* Fixed `Unknown: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException:
NoSuchObjectException` in `crawl_grants` task by ignoring the database
that is not found
([#967](#967)).
* Fixed ruff config for ruff==2.0
([#969](#969)).
* Made groups integration tests less flaky
([#965](#965)).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants