Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(platform)!: key disabled at based on state transition block time #1771

Merged

Conversation

QuantumExplorer
Copy link
Member

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Disabled at was part of identity update state transition. However it was user based, which could cause issues if transactions were in mempool for too long.

What was done?

Instead of being user based, the disabled at is now based on block execution, it will take the block execution time instead.

How Has This Been Tested?

Our test suite.

Breaking Changes

Removed disabled at from state transition. Removed validation logic for disabled at.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Copy link
Member

@shumkov shumkov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer merged commit 83d9424 into v1.0-dev Mar 14, 2024
63 checks passed
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer deleted the feat/keyDisabledAtBasedOnStateTransitionBlockTime branch March 14, 2024 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants