forked from bitcoin/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: attempt to fix docker builds by building arm64 and amd64 separately #6588
Merged
PastaPastaPasta
merged 1 commit into
dashpay:develop
from
PastaPastaPasta:fix-attempt-docker-release
Feb 19, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Runner Label for release-arm64
The
runs-on
clause is set toubuntu-22.04-arm
, but this label is not recognized among the available runner labels. Consider replacing it with a valid label likearm64
(or another appropriate valid label) to ensure the job runs on the intended ARM runner.📝 Committable suggestion
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
81-81: label "ubuntu-22.04-arm" is unknown. available labels are "windows-latest", "windows-latest-8-cores", "windows-2022", "windows-2019", "ubuntu-latest", "ubuntu-latest-4-cores", "ubuntu-latest-8-cores", "ubuntu-latest-16-cores", "ubuntu-24.04", "ubuntu-22.04", "ubuntu-20.04", "macos-latest", "macos-latest-xl", "macos-latest-xlarge", "macos-latest-large", "macos-15-xlarge", "macos-15-large", "macos-15", "macos-14-xl", "macos-14-xlarge", "macos-14-large", "macos-14", "macos-13-xl", "macos-13-xlarge", "macos-13-large", "macos-13", "macos-12-xl", "macos-12-xlarge", "macos-12-large", "macos-12", "self-hosted", "x64", "arm", "arm64", "linux", "macos", "windows". if it is a custom label for self-hosted runner, set list of labels in actionlint.yaml config file
(runner-label)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nope; this exists. see https://github.blog/changelog/2025-01-16-linux-arm64-hosted-runners-now-available-for-free-in-public-repositories-public-preview/ for more info
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
@PastaPastaPasta Thank you for the correction. You're absolutely right - the
ubuntu-22.04-arm
runner is indeed available as part of GitHub's new ARM64 runners release.🌐 Web query:
💡 Result:
GitHub Actions introduced expanded support for ARM64 runners in 2025 with distinct labeling options:
Standard GitHub-hosted ARM64 labels (public repos)
ubuntu-latest-arm64
Primary label for Linux-based ARM64 runners using Ubuntu 22.04[10][6]
linux-arm64
Generic identifier combining OS and architecture[7][10]
Self-hosted runner labels
For custom setups:
self-hosted
,linux
,ARM64
(combined as[self-hosted, linux, ARM64]
)[4][7]Organizations can add tags like
gpu
oriot
alongside architecture/OS identifiers[4][7]Availability notes
The ARM64 rollout followed a phased timeline:
For workflows targeting ARM64 in public repos:
Citations:
@PastaPastaPasta I apologize for my previous response. After double-checking the documentation, it appears that the correct runner labels for ARM64 are either
ubuntu-latest-arm64
orlinux-arm64
. The labelubuntu-22.04-arm
might not work as expected. Would you like to update the workflow to use one of these officially supported labels?✏️ Learnings added
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!