Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: scheduler log rotation #187

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 4, 2022
Merged

feat: scheduler log rotation #187

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 4, 2022

Conversation

yottahmd
Copy link
Collaborator

@yottahmd yottahmd commented Jul 4, 2022

No description provided.

@yottahmd yottahmd marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2022 07:25
@yottahmd yottahmd force-pushed the feat/scheduler-log-rotation branch from 6df72e3 to d63108a Compare July 4, 2022 07:37
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #187 (d63108a) into main (675c6ce) will increase coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 89.70%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #187      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.28%   83.38%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          45       46       +1     
  Lines        3230     3293      +63     
==========================================
+ Hits         2690     2746      +56     
- Misses        409      414       +5     
- Partials      131      133       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/logger/simple.go 88.52% <88.52%> (ø)
internal/runner/agent.go 85.07% <100.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 675c6ce...d63108a. Read the comment docs.

@yottahmd yottahmd merged commit eaed682 into main Jul 4, 2022
@yottahmd yottahmd deleted the feat/scheduler-log-rotation branch July 4, 2022 07:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants