Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump patch version os mako and oauthlib for security #136

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2022

Conversation

sblack-usu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

✅ Result of Pytest Coverage

---------- coverage: platform linux, python 3.9.14-final-0 -----------

Name Stmts Miss Cover
dspback/init.py 0 0 100%
dspback/config/init.py 82 0 100%
dspback/database/init.py 0 0 100%
dspback/database/models.py 52 0 100%
dspback/database/procedures.py 30 3 90%
dspback/dependencies.py 162 26 84%
dspback/main.py 36 2 94%
dspback/pydantic_schemas.py 139 3 98%
dspback/routers/init.py 0 0 100%
dspback/routers/authentication.py 65 30 54%
dspback/routers/earthchem.py 84 52 38%
dspback/routers/external.py 34 0 100%
dspback/routers/hydroshare.py 64 33 48%
dspback/routers/metadata_class.py 44 10 77%
dspback/routers/repository_authorization.py 43 6 86%
dspback/routers/submissions.py 27 3 89%
dspback/routers/zenodo.py 74 42 43%
dspback/schemas/init.py 0 0 100%
dspback/schemas/earthchem/init.py 0 0 100%
dspback/schemas/earthchem/model.py 199 0 100%
dspback/schemas/external/model.py 103 0 100%
dspback/schemas/hydroshare/model.py 111 0 100%
dspback/schemas/zenodo/init.py 0 0 100%
dspback/schemas/zenodo/model.py 90 0 100%
TOTAL 1439 210 85%
======================== 18 passed, 1

@sblack-usu sblack-usu merged commit 9c3f989 into develop Sep 27, 2022
@sblack-usu sblack-usu deleted the dependency-update branch September 27, 2022 20:10
pkdash added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Maurier added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
* [#136] number of matching records for term based search

* [#136] get search matching record count for filter based search

* fix: use facet stage to compute total count

* fix: handle empty search results

* refactor: base search aggregate stages

* [#136] code formatting

* chore: code cleanup

---------

Co-authored-by: Maurier <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant