Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add the tree Close api #905

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

feat: add the tree Close api #905

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

cool-develope
Copy link
Collaborator

@cool-develope cool-develope requested a review from a team as a code owner March 8, 2024 15:03
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update introduces a Close method to both the MutableTree and nodeDB structures, enhancing resource management by allowing for proper closure of these structures. This addition includes setting internal fields to nil and ensuring that associated resources are released correctly. A test has been added for the MutableTree's Close method to verify its functionality, focusing on the ability to close without errors after typical operations like setting a key-value pair and saving versions.

Changes

File(s) Summary
mutable_tree.go, mutable_tree_test.go Added Close method to MutableTree and a test TestMutableTreeClose for verifying its functionality.
nodedb.go Introduced Close method in nodeDB for proper closure, focusing on releasing resources without directly closing the database but closing the batch instead.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Note: Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository by the repository owner. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@cool-develope
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cool-develope commented Mar 8, 2024

backport to release/v1.1.x for store/v2

nodedb.go Outdated
Comment on lines 943 to 950
// Close the nodeDB.
func (ndb *nodeDB) Close() error {
ndb.mtx.Lock()
defer ndb.mtx.Unlock()

// skip the db.Close() since it can be used by other trees
return ndb.batch.Close()
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The implementation of the Close method in the nodeDB struct correctly acquires a lock to ensure thread safety and closes the batch. However, it's noted that db.Close() is intentionally skipped, which is a sensible decision if the database connection is shared across multiple instances or parts of the application. To improve code maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind not calling db.Close(), as this could be helpful for future maintainers or contributors who might wonder about this decision.


Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
// Close the nodeDB.
func (ndb *nodeDB) Close() error {
ndb.mtx.Lock()
defer ndb.mtx.Unlock()
// skip the db.Close() since it can be used by other trees
return ndb.batch.Close()
}
// Close the nodeDB.
func (ndb *nodeDB) Close() error {
ndb.mtx.Lock()
defer ndb.mtx.Unlock()
// skip the db.Close() since it can be used by other trees
return ndb.batch.Close()
}

Comment on lines +1449 to +1459
func TestMutableTreeClose(t *testing.T) {
db := dbm.NewMemDB()
tree := NewMutableTree(db, 0, true, log.NewNopLogger())

_, err := tree.Set([]byte("hello"), []byte("world"))
require.NoError(t, err)

_, _, err = tree.SaveVersion()
require.NoError(t, err)

require.NoError(t, tree.Close())
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test TestMutableTreeClose correctly tests the basic functionality of the Close method by setting a key-value pair, saving the version, and then closing the tree. However, it could be enhanced by adding assertions to verify the state of the tree after closing. For instance, attempting further operations on the closed tree (like setting a new key-value pair or saving another version) should result in an error. This would ensure that the Close method not only completes without errors but also effectively prevents further operations on the tree, which is crucial for resource management.

Consider adding the following checks:

  • Verify that the internal state of the tree is as expected after closing (e.g., internal fields are set to nil).
  • Attempt to perform operations on the tree after closing it and assert that these operations result in an error.

This would provide a more comprehensive test coverage for the Close method, ensuring it behaves as expected in various scenarios.

nodedb.go Outdated
defer ndb.mtx.Unlock()

// skip the db.Close() since it can be used by other trees
return ndb.batch.Close()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we set ndb.batch = nil after close?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

absolutely!

@cool-develope cool-develope merged commit 0d441f5 into master Mar 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@cool-develope cool-develope deleted the feat/close_tree branch March 13, 2024 13:17
@cool-develope
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Mergifyio backport release/v1.1.x

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Mar 13, 2024

backport release/v1.1.x

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 0d441f5)
tac0turtle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants