WIP: fixes for biased simulation RandomAmount

[rigelrozanski]

ref #3735

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)

• Linked to github-issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.

• Wrote tests

• Updated relevant documentation (docs/)

• Added entries in PENDING.md with issue #

• rereviewed Files changed in the github PR explorer

---

For Admin Use:

• Added appropriate labels to PR (ex. wip, ready-for-review, docs)
• Reviewers Assigned
• Squashed all commits, uses message "Merge pull request #XYZ: [title]" (coding standards)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3737 into cwgoes/alternative-negative-coins-fix will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 11.11%.

@@                            Coverage Diff                            @@
##           cwgoes/alternative-negative-coins-fix    #3737      +/-   ##
=========================================================================
- Coverage                                  61.23%   61.15%   -0.09%     
=========================================================================
  Files                                        190      190              
  Lines                                      14042    14050       +8     
=========================================================================
- Hits                                        8599     8592       -7     
- Misses                                      4905     4919      +14     
- Partials                                     538      539       +1

[jaekwon]

I'm not much in favor of supporting unbiased random generators... what's the point of not biasing?

[rigelrozanski]

closing in favour of #3744