Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update modules list doc #23172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

hattizai
Copy link
Contributor

@hattizai hattizai commented Jan 4, 2025

Description

update and sort the modules list.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated Cosmos SDK module list in documentation
    • Removed Params module entry from README
    • Added new modules like Accounts, Epochs, and Protocolpool
    • Refined module documentation to reflect current SDK state

@hattizai hattizai requested a review from a team as a code owner January 4, 2025 06:34
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the documentation and README files to reflect changes in the Cosmos SDK module ecosystem. The modifications include updating the list of available modules in the documentation, removing the Params module entry from the README, and introducing new modules like Accounts, Epochs, and Protocolpool. The changes appear to be part of a broader documentation and module organization effort.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/build/build.md Updated module list from previous set (Auth, Crisis, Staking, etc.) to new set including Accounts, Epochs, Protocolpool
x/README.md Removed Params module entry from the module list

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

backport/v0.52.x, C:x/accounts

Suggested reviewers

  • sontrinh16
  • tac0turtle
  • julienrbrt

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/build/build.md (2)

8-8: Consider standardizing module naming conventions.

The module names should follow consistent naming conventions. For example:

  • "Protocolpool" could be "Protocol Pool" or "protocol-pool" for better readability
  • "Tx" could be expanded to "Transaction" for clarity
-* [Modules](./modules/README.md) - Information about the various modules available in the Cosmos SDK: Accounts, Auth, Authz, Bank, Circuit, Consensus, Distribution, Epochs, Evidence, Feegrant, Genutil, Governance, Group, Mint, NFT, Protocolpool, Slashing, Staking, Tx, Upgrade, Validate.
+* [Modules](./modules/README.md) - Information about the various modules available in the Cosmos SDK: Accounts, Auth, Authz, Bank, Circuit, Consensus, Distribution, Epochs, Evidence, Feegrant, Genutil, Governance, Group, Mint, NFT, Protocol Pool, Slashing, Staking, Transaction, Upgrade, Validate.

8-8: Enhance module list with brief descriptions.

Consider organizing the modules into functional groups and adding brief descriptions to help users understand their purposes. For example:

-* [Modules](./modules/README.md) - Information about the various modules available in the Cosmos SDK: Accounts, Auth, Authz, Bank, Circuit, Consensus, Distribution, Epochs, Evidence, Feegrant, Genutil, Governance, Group, Mint, NFT, Protocolpool, Slashing, Staking, Tx, Upgrade, Validate.
+* [Modules](./modules/README.md) - Information about the various modules available in the Cosmos SDK:
+  * Core Functionality:
+    - Accounts: Account management and authentication
+    - Auth: Authentication and signatures
+    - Authz: Authorization for accounts
+    - Bank: Token transfers and balances
+    - Transaction: Transaction handling
+  * Governance & Staking:
+    - Governance: On-chain governance
+    - Group: Group-based decision making
+    - Staking: Proof-of-stake mechanics
+    - Slashing: Validator punishment
+  * Network Operations:
+    - Circuit: Circuit breaker functionality
+    - Consensus: Consensus parameters
+    - Distribution: Fee distribution
+    - Epochs: Epoch-based execution
+    - Evidence: Evidence handling
+    - Feegrant: Fee delegation
+    - Genutil: Genesis utilities
+    - Mint: Token minting
+    - Protocol Pool: Protocol-owned liquidity
+    - Upgrade: Software upgrades
+    - Validate: Transaction validation
+  * Assets:
+    - NFT: Non-fungible tokens
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 07d5168 and a7c1b33.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/build/build.md (1 hunks)
  • x/README.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • x/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/build/build.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

@bearycool11

This comment was marked as spam.

Copy link

@bearycool11 bearycool11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make sure to add this to your workflow YAML

jobs:
assign-reviewers:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Assign reviewers
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
script: |
const { owner, repo } = context.repo;
async function getCurrentPR() {
if (context.payload.pull_request) {
return context.payload.pull_request;
}
const allPRs = await github.rest.pulls.list({
owner,
repo,
state: 'open',
});
return allPRs.data.find(pr => pr.head.sha === context.sha);
}
const pr = await getCurrentPR();
if (!pr) {
console.log('No matching PR found.');
return;
}
console.log(Processing PR #${pr.number});
const reviewers = pr.requested_reviewers.map(reviewer => reviewer.login);
if (reviewers.length === 0) {
console.log('No reviewers found for this PR.');
return;
}
console.log(Current reviewers: ${reviewers.join(', ')});
await github.rest.issues.addAssignees({
owner,
repo,
issue_number: pr.number,
assignees: reviewers,
});
console.log(Assigned ${reviewers.join(', ')} as assignees to PR #${pr.number});

Copy link

@bearycool11 bearycool11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and again do this

I agree and further add
+* Modules - Information about the various modules available in the Cosmos SDK: Accounts, Auth, Authz, Bank, Circuit, Consensus, Distribution, Epochs, Evidence, Feegrant, Genutil, Governance, Group, Mint, NFT, Protocol Pool, Slashing, Staking, Transaction, Broadcast, Cotracts, Upgrade, Validate.

consider later also implementing DeFi (Moralis), Block(cypher)Chain Ledger, BTC, ETH, ATOM mainnet protocols and such.

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch removing params. Thank you!

@julienrbrt julienrbrt enabled auto-merge January 6, 2025 07:57
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit da19b36 Jan 6, 2025
70 of 74 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants