refactor(vesting): fix build #19539
refactor(vesting): fix build #19539
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes encompass streamlining the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/auth/vesting/module.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
x/auth/vesting/module.go (2)
- 2-7: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-48]
The removal of the
RegisterServicesfunction and related imports, as mentioned in the summary, is not directly visible in the provided code snippet. However, this change is significant as it alters how module services are registered, moving away from gRPC-based service registration. This could have implications for how clients interact with the module and might necessitate updates in documentation, client code, and tests to reflect the new registration mechanism. Ensure that all necessary updates are made and consider the impact on downstream modules or clients that might rely on the previous gRPC-based service registration.
- 2-7: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [44-44]
The
ConsensusVersionfunction has been adjusted to return a hardcoded value of1. This change seems straightforward but is crucial for the module's compatibility with the consensus mechanism. Ensure that this version increment aligns with the overall versioning strategy of the application and that any implications of this change on consensus and state migration processes are thoroughly evaluated. It's also important to verify that all necessary documentation and tests reflect this version change to avoid any confusion or issues during upgrades.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (3 hunks)
- x/auth/vesting/README.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)
- 27-38: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-39]
The changes in the
build.ymlworkflow remove conditional steps based on Git differences, simplifying the workflow. Ensure that the removal of these conditions does not impact the ability to build specific changesets or branches, especially for larger projects where build optimization and specificity are crucial.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
get-diff-actionis extensively used in other workflows (test.ymlandlint.yml), but its removal frombuild.ymlis specific to that workflow and does not directly impact the usage of the action in other workflows. The original concern about ensuring the removal does not impact the ability to build specific changesets or branches remains valid but is isolated to thebuild.ymlworkflow. The review comment's concern about potential impacts due to the removal of conditional steps based on Git differences inbuild.ymlis acknowledged, but there's no direct evidence of interdependency with other workflows that would be affected by this change.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if any other workflows or scripts depend on the outputs of the removed steps. rg --type yaml 'get-diff-action' .github/workflows/Length of output: 3132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/integration/rapidgen/rapidgen.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
tests/integration/rapidgen/rapidgen.go (1)
- 218-223: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-184]
The removal of vesting account creation messages (
MsgCreateVestingAccount,MsgCreatePermanentLockedAccount, andMsgCreatePeriodicVestingAccount) aligns with the deprecation of thex/auth/vestingmodule in favor ofx/accounts. It's important to ensure that any tests or functionality that depended on these messages are either updated or removed to reflect this change. Additionally, verify that the deprecation and removal have been communicated clearly in the project's documentation to inform users and developers of the change.
Description
Follow-up of #19535
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
vestingmodule.x/auth/vestingmodule in favor ofx/accounts.AppModulewithin thevestingpackage.x/auth/vestingmodule for existing chains.