Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce chunks storage usage in integration tests #4296

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 21, 2021

Conversation

pracucci
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does:
Following up the deprecation of the chunks storage, in this PR I'm proposing to:

  1. Delete chunks storage tests for which we also have a blocks storage counterpart
  2. Delete docs/configuration/single-process-config.md from doc and move docs/configuration/single-process-config.yaml to docs/chunks-storage/single-process-config.yaml

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
N/A

Checklist

  • Tests updated
  • Documentation added
  • CHANGELOG.md updated - the order of entries should be [CHANGE], [FEATURE], [ENHANCEMENT], [BUGFIX]

@pracucci pracucci requested review from pstibrany and jtlisi June 18, 2021 13:05
pracucci added 3 commits June 18, 2021 15:12
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@jtlisi jtlisi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pracucci pracucci merged commit 8bdf5b1 into master Jun 21, 2021
@pracucci pracucci deleted the reduce-chunks-storage-usage-in-integration-tests branch June 21, 2021 08:03
simonswine pushed a commit to grafana/e2e that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2022
…x#4296)

* Reduce chunks storage usage in integration tests

Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>

* Fixed userID in integration tests

Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>

* Deleted unused code

Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>

* Fixed 'make doc'

Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants