Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure umask is set appropriately for 'system service' #6791

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2020

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Jun 26, 2020

We need a umask of 0022 to ensure containers are created correctly, but we set a different one prior to starting the server (to ensure the unix socket has the right permissions). Thus, we need to set the umask after the socket has been bound, but before the server begins accepting requests.

Fixes #6787

We need a umask of 0022 to ensure containers are created
correctly, but we set a different one prior to starting the
server (to ensure the unix socket has the right permissions).
Thus, we need to set the umask after the socket has been bound,
but before the server begins accepting requests.

Fixes containers#6787

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 26, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Jun 26, 2020

@rhatdan @baude @vrothberg @jwhonce PTAL

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM, but would like a head nod from @jwhonce

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jun 29, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 29, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6213488 into containers:master Jun 29, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

remote api with podman 2.0.0 sets permissions of / to 600 instead of 755
5 participants