-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 794
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
copier: RemoveAll possibly-directories #3656
copier: RemoveAll possibly-directories #3656
Conversation
When we attempt to remove a directory to make way for a non-directory as part of extracting content, use RemoveAll() instead of Remove(). Signed-off-by: Nalin Dahyabhai <[email protected]>
LGTM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: flouthoc, giuseppe, nalind The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Thanks, Nalin! That got me further but
|
I can't reproduce that here with the Dockerfile from #3655. What's the digest of the |
Apologies, I used a braindump with another base image. It works with from alpine
copy --from=fedora / / |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
When we attempt to remove a directory to make way for a non-directory as part of extracting content, use RemoveAll() instead of Remove().
How to verify it
Added to a unit test!
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3655
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?