-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 802
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add routes propagation for VRF plugin #874
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you can use add here now since you are making sure to copy only routes that are not supposed to exist. In case there is a conflict (error), users should be aware of it and fix it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried to use the RouteAdd here but it seems that one of IPv6 route is copied to saved routes:
From the vrf_test.go: https://github.com/containernetworking/plugins/pull/874/files#diff-d8b21f1b7cbf938511615ea01f7b56215325cb65d64b45b5cd089e01c210bf6eR197
So instead I have used the RouteReplace
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @korroot.
Yes, it seems that the concept of SCOPE_UNIVERSE is different in IPv6 (read about it and ran some tests). There will be conflicts after the ipv6 addresses are added with the block above (or with the sysctl option).
Anyway, I'm fine with using Replace to overcome this. But I think it might be cleaner to check that the Gw is different than nil, and add only those routes (with regular Add). Either option is fine.
@squeed, could you please approve the workflow of this PR?