Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: slow response gm webhook #1256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2023
Merged

fix: slow response gm webhook #1256

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2023

Conversation

trkhoi
Copy link
Contributor

@trkhoi trkhoi commented Nov 30, 2023

What's this PR does ?

e.g: Update API get balances

Which UI commands affect by this change ?

e.g: /balances

DoD

  • Is it public API in documentation? Any docs update required ?
  • Does it change the response data shape ?
  • Is it require to update the mock data in preview ?
  • Include the sample call / example in this PR

@trkhoi trkhoi merged commit c4e12e0 into develop Nov 30, 2023
1 of 2 checks passed
@trkhoi trkhoi deleted the fix/slow-response-gm-webhook branch November 30, 2023 04:01
trkhoi added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
@trkhoi
Merge branch 'develop'
b55e4a4 
* develop:
  fix: slow response gm webhook (#1256)
  fix: restore api create guild (#1255)
jphuc96 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): 6.23.1 [skip ci]
09baae7 
## [6.23.1](v6.23.0...v6.23.1) (2023-11-30)

### Bug Fixes

* restore api create guild ([#1255](#1255)) ([312c81c](312c81c))
* slow response gm webhook ([#1256](#1256)) ([c4e12e0](c4e12e0))
@jphuc96
Copy link
Collaborator

jphuc96 commented Nov 30, 2023

🎉 This PR is included in version 6.23.1 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
released
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@trkhoi @jphuc96