-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FYST-843 Implement MD502R XML/PDF Part 2: disability, retirement/pension income #5489
FYST-843 Implement MD502R XML/PDF Part 2: disability, retirement/pension income #5489
Conversation
Heroku app: https://gyr-review-app-5489-78676a7367ab.herokuapp.com/ |
…-502-r-retirement-income-xml-pdf-part-2
Co-authored-by: Anisha Ramnani <[email protected]>
end | ||
end | ||
end | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these methods were added to the intake b/c other calculators will need this logic as well
if state_file_1099_r.state_specific_followup&.send(followup_type) | ||
state_file_1099_r.taxable_amount&.round | ||
else | ||
0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there was no strict requirement that if a 1099r followup
was not present (or if it didn't match the followup_type
for this 1099R) that it should return
nilvs
0`.
Since handling nil
for summation (downstream too, not just in this block) can be tricky, chose to not go down this route unless needed for simplicity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Arin for tackling this work! 😸 Since we reviewed this on Friday, I don't have any comments or requests for changes.
…-502-r-retirement-income-xml-pdf-part-2
end | ||
end | ||
|
||
def sum_1099_r_followup_type_for_filer(filer_1099_rs, followup_type) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need to pass in the filer_1099_rs
here? or instead should we pass in primary or spouse?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ooh we can pass in the primary_or_spouse
here and call the filer_1099_rs
method from within this method!
Link to pivotal/JIRA issue
Is PM acceptance required?
Reminder: merge main into this branch and get green tests before merging to main
What was done?
How to test?
dorothy_mfj_1099_r
Screenshots (for visual changes)