Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.2: jobs: clear job claim after execution #91880

Closed

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Nov 14, 2022

Backport 2/2 commits from #91563 on behalf of @stevendanna.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


Since #89014 the job system reset a job's claim when transitioning it from pause-requested to paused and from cancel-requested to reverting. The job system signals these transitions to the running Resumer by cancelling the job's context and does not wait for the resumer to exit. Once the claim is clear, another node can adopt the job and start running it's OnFailOrCancel callback. As a result, clearing the context makes it more likely that OnFailOrCancel executions will overlap with Resume executions.

In general, Jobs need to assume that Resume may still be running while OnFailOrCancel is called. But, making it more likely isn't in our interest.

Here, we only clear the lease when we exit the job state machine. This makes it much more likely that OnFailOrCancel doesn't start until Resume has returned.

Epic: None

Release note: None


Release justification:

Since #89014 the job system reset a job's claim when transitioning it
from pause-requested to paused and from cancel-requested to
reverting. The job system signals these transitions to the running
Resumer by cancelling the job's context and does not wait for the
resumer to exit. Once the claim is clear, another node can adopt the
job and start running it's OnFailOrCancel callback. As a result,
clearing the context makes it more likely that OnFailOrCancel
executions will overlap with Resume executions.

In general, Jobs need to assume that Resume may still be running while
OnFailOrCancel is called. But, making it more likely isn't in our
interest.

Here, we only clear the lease when we exit the job state machine.
This makes it much more likely that OnFailOrCancel doesn't start until
Resume has returned.

Release note: None
Release note: None
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from a team as code owners November 14, 2022 22:49
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.2-91563 branch from 7631577 to e1e1965 Compare November 14, 2022 22:49
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from ajwerner and stevendanna and removed request for a team November 14, 2022 22:49
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Nov 14, 2022

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Nov 14, 2022
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2022

Reminder: it has been 3 weeks please merge or close your backport!

@stevendanna
Copy link
Collaborator

Merged into 22.2 here: #93475

@stevendanna stevendanna closed this Jan 4, 2023
@mgartner mgartner deleted the blathers/backport-release-22.2-91563 branch May 23, 2023 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. no-backport-pr-activity O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants