Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kv: provide option to request eager txn record creation #33674

Merged

Conversation

nvanbenschoten
Copy link
Member

Informs #33656.

I'm not aware of any places where this is necessary for correctness, but it is useful to prevent test flakes until tests are updated to expect lazy transaction record creation.

Release note: None

Informs cockroachdb#33656.

I'm not aware of any places where this is necessary for correctness,
but it is useful to prevent test flakes until tests are updated to
expect lazy transaction record creation.

Release note: None
@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten requested review from tbg and a team January 11, 2019 19:32
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@tbg tbg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice.

@nvanbenschoten
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

craig bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
33674: kv: provide option to request eager txn record creation r=nvanbenschoten a=nvanbenschoten

Informs #33656.

I'm not aware of any places where this is necessary for correctness, but it is useful to prevent test flakes until tests are updated to expect lazy transaction record creation.

Release note: None

Co-authored-by: Nathan VanBenschoten <[email protected]>
@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Jan 11, 2019

Build succeeded

@craig craig bot merged commit bd00a26 into cockroachdb:master Jan 11, 2019
@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten deleted the nvanbenschoten/eagerTxnRecord branch January 30, 2019 23:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants