-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 640
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What: GB mtg - Add competencies and DD throughput #1499
Conversation
Why: * it was requested the TOC describe used competencies for their work to better inform candidates * it was requested the TOC explicitly state minimum throughput for Due Diligence This change address the need by: * Adding explicit throughput on line 39 for accountability * Establish initial competencies at line 47 Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Nit: I think the "onboarding" title/theme of this doc is somewhat overloaded, and suggest you might like to break some or all of this out into an "expectations" doc. |
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 (non-binding)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
+1 (non-binding) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@TheFoxAtWork added some comments where it would be good to clarify further
Signed-off-by: Josh Berkus <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bob Killen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Aravena <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Aravena <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Emily Fox <[email protected]>
@angellk We'll need to rework the TOC DD guide to include the more recent changes, like the lightweight/triage portions. I've added the indicator that it is expected, but we dont have info on what that actually is: make sure the adopter form is filled out, make sure the criteria are initially met, what to do when a project isnt ready ,etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you @TheFoxAtWork ! i'll open the corresponding issue for the DD guide updates - and with 4 TOC reviewers and 2 GB reviewers, looks good to merge.
Why:
This change address the need by: