-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add electron supercluster eta to NanoAOD content #45703
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45703/41324 |
A new Pull Request was created by @RSalvatico for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @ftorrresd, @hqucms, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type egamma |
enable nano |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Among the current NanoAOD variables we have the electron eta and the difference (with sign) between the supercluster eta and eta. Since people often want/need to access supercluster eta, I find it an unnecessary complication to have to derive it from
deltaEtaSC
andeta
. Therefore, I propose to add the actualsuperclusterEta
, which is already there for photons. SincesuperclusterEta
was also there in the additional table used for EGMNano, I have removed it from there. For the moment, I would keepdeltaEtaSC
just so that people using 2024 prompt nanos won't have to make uncomfortable adjustments to their code to pick another variable in the middle of the dataset.PR validation:
The new variable,
superclusterEta
, now appears in the standard Nano files and behaves as expected.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
If possible, I would like to have it backported to 140X to make it effective in prompt and in the 2024 MC production.