-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0.X] instrument fitVertices
to output more information when failing assert (issue cms-sw/cmssw#44923)
#45631
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've seen that addition of a printf requires a lot of registers.
How much slower is the code after this change, is it significant?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it relevant? The printout should occur every other ten of millions events?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as I recall, if it is compiled, that's enough
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have any feeling (nor a measurement). If @cms-sw/heterogeneous-l2 have a feeling about it please chime in, otherwise it will have to be measured.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it's relevant, because the increase in register use is there even if the branch is never taken at runtime.
In general I would prefer not to add any
printf
- but since we have been unable to reproduce the assertion offline, I think in this case the extra resource usage is warranted.Assuming this helps figuring out the source of the problem and fixing it, afterwards we can move the
printf
inside someif constexpr (debug) { ... }
clause.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hard to guess, it would need to be measured 🤷🏻♂️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We checked the HLT throughput (details in [*]).
The impact of this PR on the HLT throughput is well below 1%, and somewhat within the uncertainties of these estimates.
[*]
/cdaq/physics/Run2024/2e34/v1.4.3/HLT/V2
(current pp online menu).CMSSW_14_0_13_patch1_MULTIARCHS
(with and without this PR).hilton-c2b01-44-01
(same hardware as a 2022/23 HLT node) (CPUs: 2 AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core; GPUs: 2 NVIDIA Tesla T4).