-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester
improvements
#42793
SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester
improvements
#42793
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42793/36905
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @saumyaphor4252 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild, please test |
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency/plugins/SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency/plugins/SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency/plugins/SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency/plugins/SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
CalibTracker/SiStripHitEfficiency/plugins/SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester.cc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-077037/34772/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
… inefficient modules
e1d2c16
to
eabca0b
Compare
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42793/36911
|
Pull request #42793 was updated. @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @saumyaphor4252 can you please check and sign again. |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-077037/34790/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Few miscellaneous improvements to
SiStripHitEfficiencyHarvester
, used int the DQM-based PCL StripHitEfficiency workflow.Mostly moving the computation of the summary efficiency after removing the known to be inefficient, but also some internal renaming of variables.
PR validation:
Tested with
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A
Cc: @jlagram