-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backport of #13831: Speedup Gsf component merging, return components by const reference #15279
Conversation
please test |
does not seem to give any improvements to the HLT cpu usage:
|
tracked at #15151 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for CMSSW_8_0_X. It involves the following packages: CommonTools/Utils @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are list here #13028 |
merge conflicts |
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ | |||
<flags CXXFLAGS="-Ofast"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe remove this, hoping to remove changes in RECO products and simplify integration?
... I didn't look if anything else could change the RECO products in this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a major component of the speedup...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On 7/26/16 10:42 AM, Vincenzo Innocente wrote:
In TrackingTools/GsfTools/plugins/BuildFile.xml
#15279 (comment):@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+this is a major component of the speedup...
There is essentially no speedup based on tests in HLT with PU40 done by
Andrea.
(also, recall another thread we had on -Ofast in April: there is no
significant speedup from this flag
in CMSSW RECO application
at least on the ~ 3yo Intel and AMD hardware I have tested)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/15279/files/ba717540b0163453d6beeec0f7d2cf0fd87765b8#r72300077,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbmcKCPhLRfTExfF15PI8TYBW-m_Zks5qZkcYgaJpZM4JU68_.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is in contradiction with my test of the original version of this PR for 810
ba71754
to
24dfc4e
Compare
rebased on top of CMSSW_8_0_16 |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Pull request #15279 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
-1 |
includes #15259 (backport of #13594)