Clean up from conddb V1 code

[ggovi]

Step 0. Remove dependencies on CondCore/IOVService

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ggovi for CMSSW_8_0_X.

Clean up from conddb V1 code

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/CommonAlignmentProducer
Calibration/Tools
CaloOnlineTools/HcalOnlineDb
DQM/SiStripHistoricInfoClient
DQMOffline/Alignment
DQMServices/Diagnostic

@diguida, @danduggan, @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @franzoni, @deguio, @ggovi, @mmusich, @vanbesien can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @pakhotin, @barvic, @tlampen, @mschrode, @mmusich, @threus, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[ggovi]

@cmsbuild
please test

[diguida]

please test
@ggovi the please test should appear in the first line of the comment :-)

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9478/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 334d629
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12269/9478/summary.html

[mmusich]

@ggovi @diguida are you going to provide a tool allowing to split the IOVs suitable for v2? I believe this would be highly welcome from the tracker alignment group @mschrode @tlampen

[ggovi]

@mmusich we could provide SOME replacement but I have no idea what this thing was meant for.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12269/9478/summary.html

[ggovi]

@diguida @mmusich any objection from AlCa?

[diguida]

@ggovi for me it is fine, provided that we look at the splitting IOV request from TkAl.

[mmusich]

+1

[deguio]

+1
@danduggan please scream now if you see something wrong... some class is removed.
ciao and thanks,
F.

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[danduggan]

thanks @deguio, i believe @threus removed all the current hDQM work into a different repo. Tomas - holler if you still need something here, but to me this all looks like it can go.

[davidlange6]

+1