Splitted HT category into CaloHT and PFHT categories (Backport from 76X #11150).

[ryonamin]

(2015/09/24) Added changes of #11453.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ryonamin (Ryo Yonamine) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Splitted HT category into CaloHT and PFHT categories (Backport from 76X #11150).

It involves the following packages:

HLTriggerOffline/Exotica

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[deguio]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: ff511d5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11152/7931/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11152/7931/summary.html

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[deguio]

ciao @ryonamin
you can update this one with the new scouting trigger names given that it is not yet merged.
thanks,
F.

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #11152 was updated. @cmsbuild, @danduggan, @vanbesien, @deguio can you please check and sign again.

[ryonamin]

Thank you! I didn't know this way and I noticed this is very convenient.
I have already modified the corresponding parts.

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: b7f3cc4
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11152/8351/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11152/8351/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[ryonamin]

I have made a new PR (#11620) instead of this PR because this PR can not be merged.