Use Spring Boot 2.0 for the base build (JDK8)

[boskoop]

Because Spring Boot 2.0 does not support JDK11, we build the JDK11 and JDK12 builds against Spring Boot 2.1

[boskoop]

Hi @svettwer

In order to provide Spring 5.0.x compatibility to citrus 2.8.0, the JDK8 build could build against Spring Boot 2.0, while the JDK11+ builds use Spring Boot 2.1+. This should resolve #15

BR
-- Christian

[svettwer]

Ah sure, you are right. We are using 5.0.8 in Citrus 2.8.0. An update to 5.1.10 is too greedy. 👍

[svettwer]

The build for jdk 8 is currently broken. We've to investigate this first.

[boskoop]

I agree. I might have some time later today to look into this.

[svettwer]

Seems the issue has something to do with a bytebuddy incompatibility/dependency clash.

[svettwer]

mockito/mockito#1606

[svettwer]

Working on it in https://github.com/citrusframework/citrus-simulator/tree/boskoop-feature/multi-jdk-build

[svettwer]

now the matrix build errors as the spring versions change and therefore the byte buddy version that is compatible/required

[svettwer]

fixed by downgrading bytebuddy to the same version as used in spring-boot-starter-test.

[bbortt]

Should close this in favour of #82.

[christophd]

Closing in favor of #82

[svettwer]

I leave those PRs open in general, because they are flagged as merged automatically if the internal branch I've created is merged. I mean it makes no technical difference but merged PRs look way more friendly than closed ones. 😆

[bbortt]

ye but I mean this one is kind of a "won't fix" because it is duplicated, right? just not that we forget about it ;)