-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 909
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
choco list / search / info - Some packages can't be found #1004
Comments
This looks like a dual issue, possibly more of an issue with chocolatey.org than it is with the client. |
|
|
@ferventcoder yip, works for me locally, a package is returned for each command, but not when running against chocolatey.org. |
That tells me it's probably more of an issue in something on the community repository. |
I had the same problem and looked into it.
Meanwhile,
It seems that there is an issue on chocolatey.org, but I think it will be better that
|
That actually helps determine what the issue may be. I wonder why it doesn't attempt to collect the rest of the results though. |
This is serious issue IMO and deserves more attention. Even chocolatey itself can't be found:
|
In the meantime, here is the
Complete output:
|
Invoking it via irm "https://chocolatey.org/api/v2/Search()?`$filter=(tolower(Id)%20eq%20'git')%20and%20IsLatestVersion&`$orderby=Id&`$skip=0&`$top=30&searchTerm='git'&targetFramework=''&includePrerelease=false" -Verbose
VERBOSE: GET http://chocolatey.org/api/v2/Search()?$filter=(tolower(Id) eq 'git') and IsLatestVersion&$orderby=Id&searchTerm='git'&targetFramework=''&includePrerelease=false with 0-byte
payload
VERBOSE: received 505-byte response of content type application/atom+xml;charset=utf-8 However, when I remove
Works with chocolatey package too:
|
It looks like this issue is also behind the problem that I faced constantly that This works for both git and chocolatey packages.
|
The order by id is definitely something we should look to remove from the call. |
Use FindPackagesById to return results for info and exact id searches.
* stable: (35 commits) (GH-1238) Save extra info about installed packages (maint) allow overrides (GH-1253)(GH-1263) List/Search returns Summary and Release Notes (GH-1101) Search results by relevance by default (GH-1004) Ensure choco info returns results (maint) Note on install if auto-uninstall possible (maint) look for licensed assembly based build-type (GH-615) capture more user information (GH-1145) show inner exception message (GH-1267) API - get configuration (maint) Resources proj does not produce pdb file (doc) update nuspec authors (doc) update licensed release notes (build) ILMerge pdb files (GH-1247) ensure xml documentation (maint) note force install is for same version (GH-1243) Update Chocolatey shims (GH-1243)(shimgen) upgrade to 0.8.x (maint) fix copyright double period (log) show exit code when running -v ...
Due to some changes in the way that 0.10.6 worked to allow for GH-1004 to always return results with info and exact searches, page size and page was being ignored. Fortunately limiting results is supported - even though it does need to call completely through and then filter locally.
This happens again. Without version
With version
|
|
This should be reopened |
Can we reopen this, still broken |
Got this error this morning for the first time, for packages Anyone knows how to track this problem? I don't know if it's a load-related problem, a networking issue, or what. |
And now some of the same commands seem to work... probably it's just an issue related to load on the servers. If it can help someone to pinpoint the root cause, we had issues this morning, around 9.30 CET (8.30 UTC). |
Please reopen. Found this issue after discovering this bug for multiple of my computers on different networks, even had a friend try a few tests. What can I do to help? edit> I should also mention that the same thing happens on https://chocolatey.org/packages I notice others using the "exact" switch. This also works for my query, but I don't know a way to test that on the site. Does that indicate that this is a globbing/matching issue? |
Still broken, please reopen. |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: