Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Call original_bytes_slice in check_against_code_hash #1809

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

exeokan
Copy link
Contributor

@exeokan exeokan commented Feb 4, 2025

@exeokan exeokan requested a review from eyusufatik as a code owner February 4, 2025 16:31
@auto-assign auto-assign bot requested a review from rakanalh February 4, 2025 16:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.7%. Comparing base (2d7b258) to head (e0f089d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on nightly.

Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
crates/evm/src/evm/db.rs 85.7% <100.0%> (ø)

... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

@eyusufatik eyusufatik merged commit e6cff13 into nightly Feb 4, 2025
14 checks passed
@eyusufatik eyusufatik deleted the ege/original_byte_slice branch February 4, 2025 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

call keccak256 for smart contracts with original_bytes_slice() not original_bytes
2 participants