Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

proxy: Add utility pallet access to PodOperation proxy #1196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2023

Conversation

cdamian
Copy link
Contributor

@cdamian cdamian commented Feb 9, 2023

Description

In an effort to speed up the process of NFT minting in the POD, we would need to batch a couple of extrinsics.

This change is meant to allow the POD operator to use the utility batch call on behalf of the identity that is minting the NFT.

Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested by running all the available test suites in the centrifuge POD.

Checklist:

  • I have added Rust doc comments to structs, enums, traits and functions
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I rebased on the latest main branch

@cdamian cdamian force-pushed the add-utility-pallet-access-to-pod-operation-proxy branch from e4e0ffc to 25daa88 Compare February 9, 2023 12:51
Copy link
Contributor

@mikiquantum mikiquantum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@cdamian cdamian merged commit 6418e16 into main Feb 10, 2023
@cdamian cdamian deleted the add-utility-pallet-access-to-pod-operation-proxy branch February 10, 2023 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants