Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing flaky governance test #1155

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Oct 7, 2019

Conversation

mrsmkl
Copy link
Contributor

@mrsmkl mrsmkl commented Oct 1, 2019

Description

Reading the correct block number from events instead of builtin variable.

Tested

Let's see if this works better...

Other changes

Related issues

Backwards compatibility

@mrsmkl mrsmkl added the automerge Have PR merge automatically when checks pass label Oct 1, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1155 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1155   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.47%   66.47%           
=======================================
  Files         262      262           
  Lines        7648     7648           
  Branches      509      441   -68     
=======================================
  Hits         5084     5084           
- Misses       2462     2464    +2     
+ Partials      102      100    -2
Flag Coverage Δ
#mobile 66.47% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/mobile/src/utils/formatting.ts 89.74% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
packages/mobile/src/identity/reducer.ts 41.66% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 33084de...db7b951. Read the comment docs.

@asaj
Copy link
Contributor

asaj commented Oct 2, 2019

@mrsmkl can you please move the test back to its original location in the file to make the diff easier to read?

@mrsmkl mrsmkl removed their assignment Oct 2, 2019
@mrsmkl mrsmkl requested a review from ashishb October 2, 2019 18:28
@mrsmkl mrsmkl removed the automerge Have PR merge automatically when checks pass label Oct 3, 2019
@mrsmkl
Copy link
Contributor Author

mrsmkl commented Oct 3, 2019

Looks like there is more flakiness. I'll investigate further.

@mrsmkl mrsmkl assigned mrsmkl and unassigned ashishb Oct 3, 2019
@mrsmkl mrsmkl assigned ashishb and unassigned mrsmkl Oct 3, 2019
@mrsmkl mrsmkl added the automerge Have PR merge automatically when checks pass label Oct 7, 2019
@ashishb ashishb merged commit 1ecacd7 into celo-org:master Oct 7, 2019
aaronmgdr added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2019
* master: (35 commits)
  [Wallet] Fix top of emojis cut off in the activity feed (#1243)
  Adding a contract to store minimum required client version (#1081)
  Revert "Feature #909 proxy delegatecall (#1152)" (#1241)
  Use ContractKit to get addresses for Blockchain API (#1175)
  Feature #909 proxy delegatecall (#1152)
  Fix Faucet done message (#1217)
  Updated SETUP.md with new yarn process (#1224)
  Adding `increaseAllowance` and `decreaseAllowance` methods (#1196)
  extracting function signatures (#1061)
  Fix integration hardcode (#1208)
  Fixing flaky governance test (#1155)
  Restore CI branch (#1223)
  [wallet] e2e back to green (#1210)
  [Wallet] Implement new import wallet flow designs (#1209)
  [Wallet] Fix disable conditions for butons on Enter Invite screen (#1214)
  [protocol] Rename infrastructureFraction to proposerFraction (#1174)
  [ck] Proper promise treatment to avoid UnhandledPromises (#1219)
  [ck] Transform StableToken parameters from fixidity format (#1218)
  [wallet]Store encrypted local signing key (#1188)
  2019-10-03 alfajores deployment (#1200)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Have PR merge automatically when checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

E2E Governance tests should work reliably
3 participants