Fix celotool dockerfile

[tkporter]

Description

Adds contractkit & protocol dependencies to the celotool dockerfile. Otherwise builds would fail, because contractkit is required (and contractkit has protocol as a dependency)

Tested

Docker builds succeeded

Other changes

n/a

Related issues

n/a

Backwards compatibility

Yes

[ashishb]

How big is the docker file now? Can you try docker inspect and report the new vs old results here?

[tkporter]

Looking at GCR "virtual size":
new: 677.2 MB
old: 548.4 MB

:(
Any ideas for reducing size?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1088 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1088   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.45%   66.45%           
=======================================
  Files         256      256           
  Lines        7367     7367           
  Branches      491      427   -64     
=======================================
  Hits         4896     4896           
- Misses       2379     2381    +2     
+ Partials       92       90    -2

Flag	Coverage Δ
#mobile	66.45% <ø> (ø)	⬆️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/mobile/src/utils/formatting.ts	87.5% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
packages/mobile/src/identity/reducer.ts	41.66% <0%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2967a7b...6628ae4. Read the comment docs.

[mcortesi]

Looking at GCR "virtual size":
new: 677.2 MB
old: 548.4 MB

:(
Any ideas for reducing size?

@ashishb this could be "fixed" if we used "npm builds" inspect of copying the mono repo...
eg. use the contractkit deployed version.

[ashishb]

Any ideas for reducing size?

Yes, do a multi-stage build - https://github.com/celo-org/celo-monorepo/blob/master/dockerfiles/cli/Dockerfile#L48