Upgrade to Cef 1750

[amaitland]

• Merge in changes from @peters
• Remove DevToolsUrl
• Remove unnecessary entries in CefSharp.Native.props
• Update cef.redist references for WinForms and WPF examples

[amaitland]

Based on PR #484
Few additional changes required to cleanup the Example projects

[amaitland]

There are still a few build warnings that need to be addressed.

[peters]

@amaitland Did you publish CefSharp.Wpf to staging ?

No joy :(

[jornh]

@peters, no Alex didn't push because my bad with not giving him push right for CefSharp.Common and CefSharp.Wpf on staging. Fixed now!

Only for https://staging.nuget.org/packages/CefSharp.WinForms/ we need the help from our benevolent leader @perlun - he's currently the only one with those rights there ... And when it's ready for prime time we again need @perlun at https://www.nuget.org/packages/CefSharp.Common/ the others I can tick off for @amaitland

Other than that nice to see good progress towards 33 👍 I guess there will be a bit of house keeping chores with the README.md, update of issues roadmap etc.?

[amaitland]

@peters I'll push the other packages to staging shortly

@jornh At what point do you think we merge these changes? As for the housekeeping, I'm happy to help out updating the relevant docs and issues

[amaitland]

I've fixed the compiler performance warnings and one xml comment

[peters]

@amaitland 33 👍

[amaitland]

I've pushed a WinForms version to staging as well

https://staging.nuget.org/packages/CefSharp.WinForms/33.0.0-pre2

[amaitland]

@jornh Can you think of any final pieces required before we merge this into master?

[jornh]

Nope, just make sure the NuGets are built with VS2012 and I think we are good!

Got any PRs or issues you think are important before pack, push, tag, move of issues that won't be closed to the non-pre milestone, copy of ChangeLog to Releases, update of README.md?

@perlun can you think of anything missing?

[jornh]

Huh? First minimalistic commit in a long time with amaitland@c542825 and I make appveyor barf saying it can't find staging.nuget.org?

Should we btw push CEF to NuGet proper and get rid of the staging reference?

[amaitland]

@jornh I think that's just unfortunate timing! lol The Release build was successful.

I'd like someone to double check the packages before pushing to Nuget proper, make sure I haven't overlooked anything.

[amaitland]

I think it's probably important to include DevTools in the next release, it's been stripped out of this commit as DevToolsUrl no longer exists.

Once this is sorted, I'll create a PR from this commit amaitland@2008b3d

[amaitland]

Looking at the PR queue in detail, I'd like to get #412 and #471 sorted and merged, then release -pre3

[jornh]

So far it's looking 👍 as seen from here, builds and runs the WinForms + Wpf Examples just fine (as expected 😄).

Looking fwd to cef.* packages without the -pre

`

[amaitland]

http://www.ro.me/ actually works now!!! Whoop!

@jornh Pushing packages to staging now 😄

[amaitland]

Uploaded! 😄

[amaitland]

I've just added my first draft of a build script for CefSharp3, it's just a modified version from cef-binary. It will build both x86 and x64 in Release mode and generate nupkg files.

[jornh]

Sweet! amaitland@7dac850 just behaved as expected with the new training wheel free cef-binary NuGets. And I saw cef.sdk has both VS2012 and VS2013 libs, though I only tested with VS2013. So I think it's safe to push those to www.NuGet.org proper now.

Then I guess the CefSharp repo doesn't need NuGet.config in the root folder any more?

[amaitland]

Guess we can get rid of NuGet.config, though it comes in handy for building your own packages and referencing them locally. So maybe just comment out the staging reference?

[jornh]

I just wanted to de-clutter the root folder a bit but you might have a point.

I'll merge this one now, then we can figure out the next steps elsewhere, maybe in #496

[amaitland]

To de-clutter the root folder perhaps we can delete nunit and old directories? Thoughts?

[jornh]

Yes, I've been looking at those too. Maybe they contain something valuable for inspiration of xUnit tests - if we ever get more of that going. Let's wait a bit with de clutter and focus on 33 😄

[amaitland]

Sounds like a plan 😄