Rename extract methods to extracting #235
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We should be consistent with the naming of our methods. At some places we used extractX, in other we used extractingX. They have all been changed to extractingX. This is consistent with the naming of AssertJ (e.g. assertThat(Map).extracting()).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
We should be consistent with the naming of our methods. At some places we used extractX, in other we used extractingX. They have all been changed to extractingX. This is consistent with the naming of AssertJ (e.g. assertThat(Map).extracting()).
Related issues
closes #217
Definition of Done
Not all items need to be done depending on the issue and the pull request.
Code changes:
Testing:
Documentation: