Update 0B.md

docs/0B.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 The idea of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) has been a popular military strategy propagated by countries that are enamored with the idea of attaining global supremacy and dominance. This idea is based on the notion that among opposing countries, each regime will pursue an arms race in the interest of 'self-preservation', against all other sets of aggressive, hostile countries. Supposedly, an eventual equilibrium will be achieved when each country runs out of resources to build weapons of mass destruction (WMD) — upon having amassed such a large stock-pile of radiological, biochemical, and computerized weaponry that the whole world can be demolished multiple times over, by those weapons. That presumptive equilibrium hasn't been achieved yet.
 
-As of June-2023, it doesn't seem like any so-called 'super power' has reached even a nominal level of being sated, where the leaders of any alliance of powerful-nations would feel sufficiently well off and secure, and consequently, not test any other country's capabilities for causing instantaneous human extinction. 
+As of March-2024, it doesn't seem like any so-called 'super power' has reached even a nominal level of being sated, where the leaders of any alliance of powerful-nations would feel sufficiently well off and secure, and consequently, not test any other country's capabilities for causing instantaneous human extinction. 
 
 So, can diplomacy come to the rescue where martial escapades of various countries seem to be taking humanity to nowhere except, directly towards oblivion? 
 
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ In any case, Europe is about to wake up to the complete and thorough realization
 
 As such, isn't it tragic, and unfortunate, that the best and brightest of a nation who are given maximum leeway along with greatest access to tax-payer money, happen to use all of that talent and resource for destruction, instead of directly working towards rehabilitation or rejuvenation of humanity.  
 
->You see, destruction is easy, because "weaponization" of a simple matchstick within parched woodlands can be trivially achieved by any assailant. 
+>You see, destruction is easy, because *"weaponization"* of a simple matchstick within parched woodlands can be trivially achieved by any assailant. 
 
 Worse, even in the event of an actual assault by a threat actor who uses arson as a means for destruction of lives and properties, the chores of investigating a scene in the aftermath of a large-scale fire, leads to infinitely many questions that cast doubt on the causal factors of the calamitous event. This issue persists among all countries of the world, and not only within the ones like the US or Canada. For example, in the aftermath of a forest fire, an investigative team has to firstly rule out natural causes like geological activities, lightning from storms, and even stray meteors from outer space. Then the chore of ruling out accidental ignition due to camp-fires, or carelessness of electrical power distribution companies has to be completed. Such investigations take years if not decades even when multiple teams investigate different angles of a large-scale tragedy, in parallel. 
 
@@ -72,25 +72,31 @@ It's just that, there honestly is no proper and scientifically accurate way to d
 
 So whether someone wants to use fruit flies, zebra-fish, mice, chicken, chimpanzees, or involuntary humans to study such topics in the name of science, the eventual conclusion about the effects of any chemical or biochemical nerve agent is the same, that is, it kills if not debilitates. 
 
-In observing such things, one might become interested in the concept of [Lethal Dosage 50 (LD50)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median_lethal_dose). This concept illustrates the median statistical ratios wherein, a particular dosage of a substance weighed in units of mass tends to kill at least fifty percent of the population of humans that become exposed to that particular substance. Unfortunately, the concept of LD50 as a measure of safety is very duplicitous because it does not say anything about the dosage at which a certain target population will become obtunded, injured, violently ill, or permanently disabled. 
+In observing such things, one might become interested in the concept of [Lethal Dosage 50 (LD50)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Median_lethal_dose). This concept illustrates the median statistical ratios wherein, a particular dosage of a substance weighed in units of mass tends to kill at least fifty percent of the population of humans that become exposed to that particular substance. Unfortunately, the concept of LD50 as a measure of safety is very duplicitous because it does not say anything about the dosage at which a certain target population will become obtunded, injured, violently ill, sterilized, or permanently disabled. 
 
-As such, there most certainly needs to be an internationally followed standard that provides accurate and precise documentation about the hazardous nature of materials for dosages, that produce illness and injury to those exposed to the material, especially if a certain percentage of the population happen to be critically susceptible to experiencing harm from that material due to various biological or environmental factors. This need is very much underserved within mining and pharmaceutical industries.
+As such, there most certainly needs to be an internationally followed standard that provides accurate and precise documentation about the hazardous nature of materials for different sets of dosages, that may produce illness and injury to those exposed to the material, especially if a certain percentage of the population happen to be critically susceptible to experiencing harm from those materials due to various biological or environmental factors. This need is very much underserved within mining and pharmaceutical industries.
 
-Here, let me make the above point a bit more folksy: imagine if you were allergic to a particular food item, or some type of substance that you could ingest, or perhaps something that could cause you to suffer immensely from merely coming into contact with it, while others may remain perfectly fine upon interacting with that substance. Now, if it were known to people serving you as a client that you were severely allergic to a particular substance, and could become grievously injured by it, wouldn't their actions of deliberately subjecting you to harm by forcibly introducing that substance into your body, constitute a criminal offense? It would most certainly be considered immoral and unethical, because immoral and unethical deeds, typically involve dishonesty, betrayal, willful ignorance, and various forms of deliberately injurious or destructive actions. Wouldn't it be worse, if such a disservice to tax-payers in the form of a planned criminal activity, was performed repeatedly by practitioners in a state-sponsored healthcare or an educational facility, on illegitimately and involuntarily detained persons? 
+Here, let me make the above point a bit more folksy: 
+
+- Imagine if you were allergic to a particular food item, or some type of a substance that you could ingest, or perhaps something that could cause you to suffer immensely from merely coming into contact with it, while others may remain perfectly fine upon interacting with that substance. Now, if it were known to people serving you as a client that you were severely allergic to a particular substance, and could become grievously injured by it, wouldn't their actions of deliberately subjecting you to harm by forcibly introducing that substance into your body, constitute a criminal offense? 
+
+- That type of an action would most certainly be considered immoral and unethical, because immoral and unethical deeds, typically involve dishonesty, betrayal, willful ignorance, and various forms of deliberately injurious or destructive actions. 
+
+- Wouldn't it be worse, if such a disservice to tax-payers in the form of a planned criminal activity, was performed repeatedly by practitioners in a state-sponsored healthcare or an educational facility, on illegitimately and involuntarily detained persons? 
 
 ## Discussion
 
 The more important thing to note here is that pernicious actions by saboteurs and sappers are too difficult to counteract, irrespective of whether their actions do or do not involve extremes like scorching the earth, and ***poisoning drinking and irrigation water supply lines.*** This is mainly because successive generations of saboteurs and sappers can stay hidden in the field, for decades if not centuries, in the name of counter-insurgency missions. They are able to do so, via support from globalized corporate groups and entities such as Blackstone. 
 
-Those types of sappers do know which dosages of various kinds of substances, produce sufficient harm to a target population while evading detection. They, have known how to vector under-the-radar attacks, since the earliest days of the Dutch East India Company, via commercial and culturally acceptable methods, in plain sight of regulatory entities concerned with public health and safety, by exploiting the lack of education and scientific knowledge among targeted populations. They also, have had the knowledge to make attacks look like addictions, natural borne diseases, ill-fated calamities, unavoidable accidents, or simplistic industrial disasters. 
+Those types of sappers do know which dosages of various kinds of substances, produce sufficient harm to a target population while evading detection. They, have known how to orchestrate under-the-radar attacks, since the earliest days of the Dutch East India Company, via commercial and culturally acceptable methods, in plain sight of regulatory entities concerned with public health and safety, by exploiting the lack of education and scientific knowledge among targeted populations. They also, have had the knowledge to make attacks look like addictions, natural borne diseases, ill-fated calamities, unavoidable accidents, or simplistic industrial disasters. 
 
-Supposedly, poor uneducated masses targeted by French, German, British, Canadian, Australian, Israeli, and US-led sappers as well as saboteurs, deserve cunning forms of abuse and harassment by overlords who happen to command those nefarious malefactors, to keep colonized masses quelled and subdued, instead of giving innocent people and refugees simple forms of equitable treatment, and genuine social upliftment. 
+Supposedly, poor uneducated masses, targeted by French, German, British, Canadian, Australian, Israeli, and US-led sappers as well as saboteurs, deserve cunning forms of abuse and harassment, by overlords who happen to command hired and trained nefarious malefactors, to keep colonized masses quelled and subdued, instead of giving innocent people and refugees simple forms of equitable treatment, and genuine social upliftment. 
 
-This entire discussion about deliberately launched toxins, and their long-term pernicious effects, might as well be just another thought experiment, or "a what-if scenario." But, when one looks at the details of the way disasters like "Bhopal Gas Tragedy", and the use of "Agent Orange" have been handled by agencies of responsible countries, it becomes evident that eliminating poor people or steadily depleting their life, was the primary objective of those agencies to begin with. 
+This entire discussion about deliberately launched toxins, and their long-term pernicious effects, might as well be just another thought experiment, or "a what-if scenario." But, when one looks at the details of the way disasters like "Bhopal Gas Tragedy", and the use of "Agent Orange" have been handled by agencies of responsible countries, it becomes evident that eliminating poor people, or steadily depleting their lives, was the primary objective of those agencies to begin with. 
 
 Now, you wouldn't suppose that someone's job could be to merely write a few paragraphs about plausible, yet, 'clear and present dangers', so as to increase the government's budget on defense spending for various kinds of 'research projects', right? 
 
-I mean, it's not like a war, amounting to trillions of dollars in fruitless expenditures, and tens of thousands of deaths, was fought in the Middle-East for more than two decades, by having it authorized using just a few slides on a PowerPoint presentation about possible production facilities of biochemical weapons of mass destruction, wherein that presentation was propped up by the likes of Colin Powell with sparse data obtained from a hillbilly named *"curve-ball"*, right? 
+I mean, it's not like a war, amounting to trillions of dollars in fruitless expenditures, and tens of thousands of deaths, was fought in the Middle-East for more than two decades during the 21st Century, by having it authorized using just a few slides on a PowerPoint presentation about possible production facilities of biochemical weapons of mass destruction, wherein that presentation was propped up by the likes of Colin Powell with sparse data obtained from a hillbilly named *"curve-ball"*, right? 
 
 Even if flaky reasons were presented to a senate on both sides of the Atlantic for initiating that war, the actual reasons for it were most certainly well founded and legitimate, weren't they? And most certainly that war has made the world a much better place for all living beings, hasn't it? At least people who made the most amount of income from that war didn't just suddenly run away from the mess they created once they realized that they had no clue about where the war was heading after two decades; or did they simply flee haphazardly? 
 
@@ -104,13 +110,13 @@ Even if flaky reasons were presented to a senate on both sides of the Atlantic f
     <br>
 </p>
 
-A few cogent paragraphs a day can generate a master's thesis in approximately a year. Staple three or four of such master's theses together, and you could even have a passable PhD dissertation. Such kind of work is especially appreciated by a number of labs in well reputed and well funded universities, in North America as well as in Western Europe, particularly in ones that are still operational and are exactly like the Allan Memorial Institute in Ontario, Canada. 
+A few cogent paragraphs a day can generate a master's thesis in approximately a year. Staple three or four of such master's theses together, and you could even have a passable PhD dissertation. Such kind of work is especially appreciated by a number of labs in well reputed and well funded universities in North America, as well as in Western Europe, particularly within ones that are still operational and are exactly like the Allan Memorial Institute in Ontario, Canada. 
 
 Many defense based research agencies, and grants committees, are perpetually flush with money and paranoia. So, to get roped into a lab funded by them, one only needs to start a conversation with some of their members at a conference, or at a dinner party, using a "what-if." 
 
 Indeed, what-ifisim is more peculiar, and much more prevalent in society than what-aboutism. The sofishticated way of passing off such what-ifs, is to label them as thought experiments. 
 
-Especially among impatient police investigators, and mediocre researchers as well as legislators who try to force-fit a narrative to a set of data, the conversation during a team meeting starts with each participant casually brainstorming about what to do next. The sentences uttered during those brainstorming sessions start with, "maybe such-and-such happened," or, "what-if a certain such-and-such could have happened, or might happen in the near future." And eventually, as the days go by, all of the "maybe" and the "what-ifs", are conveniently dropped from the conversations as well as from the produced legal documentations, and from the recorded write ups. The narratives thus obtained, become 'factual.' In such cases, the maybe turns into an actuality, due to 'manifest destiny', and through a series of official meetings glued together with a bit of gossip from conversations next to the water-cooler.
+Especially among impatient police investigators, and mediocre researchers as well as legislators who try to force-fit a narrative to a set of data, the conversation during a team meeting starts with each participant casually brainstorming about what to do next. The sentences uttered during those brainstorming sessions start with, "maybe such-and-such happened," or, "what-if a certain such-and-such could have happened or might happen in the near future." And eventually, as the days go by, all of the "maybe" and the "what-ifs", are conveniently dropped from the conversations as well as from the produced legal documentations, and from the recorded write ups. The narratives thus obtained, become 'factual.' In such cases, the maybe turns into an actuality, due to 'manifest destiny', and through a series of official meetings glued together with a bit of gossip from conversations next to the water-cooler.
 
 The smoother brainstormers and debaters with seats of authority, tend to steer those types of narratives during discussions and public hearings, by using mere interjections with phrases like, "I doubt that." They are able to pull off such phrases to gain power and personal advantages, in any conversation or an argument, because of their extra-smooth brain matter. 
 
@@ -128,7 +134,7 @@ Therefore, I only consider myself to be an amateur human who sometimes goes by t
 
 No, please don't call me a nobody. Nobody could most probably get offended, if I went around claiming to be a nobody. I haven't even obtained a ham-radio license, and my guess is that nobody would scoff at any person like me who doesn't even know Morse Code.
 
-Of course, then there are Everyone, and Anyone, each with their own sense of "poetic justice" that they feel ought to be, and needs to be, delivered to ones they see as wrongdoers.   
+Of course, then there are Everyone, and Anyone, each with their own sense of "poetic justice", which they feel ought to be, and needs to be, delivered to ones they see as wrongdoers.   
 
 
 ### Disclaimer