Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: improve consistency in variable names, comments, and docs #56

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

brianrodri
Copy link
Owner

@brianrodri brianrodri commented Mar 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Enhanced internal configurations and type definitions for TypeScript files to improve handling of JSDoc annotations.
    • Introduced mock functions for testing scenarios in the obsidian-dataview plugin.
    • Updated the structure of the Dataview API for clearer type information and functionality.
    • Adjusted the handling of periodic notes configurations and improved documentation clarity.
    • Removed unused constants related to task symbol parsing, indicating a shift in task metadata processing.
  • Documentation

    • Updated inline guidance and comments across several modules for clearer explanations of plugin components and behavior.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This update refines configuration details and documentation across several files, enhances type safety and API structure in the Obsidian Dataview module, and introduces new mocks and constants. It also removes redundant task symbol parsing logic, resulting in a cleaner implementation. The changes are primarily focused on improved type management, clearer code comments, and better-defined interfaces for testing and API interactions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
eslint.config.js, src/model/collection/periodic-notes.ts, src/model/collection/schema.ts, src/util/luxon-utils.ts, src/util/type-utils.ts Updated documentation and inline comments; added a new settings block for jsdoc in TypeScript files; improved type parameter explanations and streamlined class/method comments.
src/lib/obsidian-dataview/__mocks__/types.ts, src/model/task/lib/obsidian-tasks.const.ts Introduced new files: one providing mock functions for testing and another exporting constants for task symbol mappings and regex configurations.
src/lib/obsidian-dataview/types.ts Refactored type imports and aliases; renamed DataviewLink to ActualLink; replaced the old DataviewApi interface with a new class extending ActualDataviewApi that overrides the pages method.
src/model/task/lib/obsidian-tasks.ts Removed unused imports and constants related to task symbol parsing, thereby simplifying task metadata handling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant NewAPI as DataviewApi
    participant ParentAPI as ActualDataviewApi

    Client->>NewAPI: Call pages("query")
    NewAPI->>ParentAPI: Execute overridden pages(query)
    ParentAPI-->>NewAPI: Return DataArray result
    NewAPI-->>Client: Return processed DataArray
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a coding flair,
Hopping through changes with utmost care.
New mocks and types dance in the light,
Configs and docs now shining so bright.
With every hop, improvements rhyme—
CodeRabbit cheers in joyful time! 🥕🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 706c02d and b5c615b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/model/collection/schema.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/model/collection/schema.ts

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (4b37976) to head (b5c615b).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #56   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           14        15    +1     
  Lines          253       255    +2     
  Branches        59        59           
=========================================
+ Hits           253       255    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@brianrodri brianrodri merged commit e3b3818 into main Mar 9, 2025
2 checks passed
@brianrodri brianrodri deleted the consistency branch March 9, 2025 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants