Fix: Incidents for All Monitors #1870
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WalkthroughThis pull request integrates a new monitor type parameter into the incident data fetching process. The IncidentTable component now extracts the selected monitor’s details and type, passing the type to the useChecksFetch hook. Accordingly, the hook’s signature and dependency array are updated, and the network service now includes the monitor type as an API filter. Additionally, the useMonitorsFetch hook is refactored to build a lookup from a filtered monitors array. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant IT as IncidentTable
participant CH as useChecksFetch
participant NS as NetworkService
IT->>CH: Call useChecksFetch(selectedMonitor, selectedMonitorType, ...)
CH->>NS: getChecksByMonitor({ ..., type: selectedMonitorType })
NS-->>CH: Return checks data
CH-->>IT: Deliver checks data
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: The PR fixes an issue (FE & BE: Incidents for other monitor types #1844) related to incidents for all monitors, improving the application's functionality and user experience.
- Key components modified:
useChecksFetch,useMonitorsFetch, andNetworkService.js. - Impact assessment: The changes introduce type-based filtering for checks and monitors, enhancing the application's filtering capabilities.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The changes affect the
Incidentspage and its related hooks and services, with potential impacts on other components using these hooks and services.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: None significant.
- Component interactions: The changes introduce type-based filtering, enabling better interaction between the
Incidentspage and theNetworkService. - Integration points: The changes affect the integration between the
Incidentspage, its hooks, and theNetworkService.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- src/Pages/Incidents/Hooks/useChecksFetch.jsx - useChecksFetch
- Submitted PR Code:
const useChecksFetch = ({ selectedMonitor, selectedMonitorType, filter, dateRange, page, rowsPerPage }) => {
// ...
useEffect(() => {
// ...
if (selectedMonitorType) {
res = await networkService.getChecksByMonitor({
// ...
type: selectedMonitorType,
// ...
});
} else {
// ...
}
// ...
}, [user, dateRange, page, rowsPerPage, filter, selectedMonitor, selectedMonitorType]);
// ...
};- Analysis:
- The PR introduces a new parameter
selectedMonitorTypeto theuseChecksFetchhook, allowing filters based on monitor type. - The
getChecksByMonitorcall now includes thetypeparameter ifselectedMonitorTypeis provided, enabling type-based filtering. - Edge cases and error handling: If
selectedMonitorTypeis not provided, the API call should still work as before, but it might miss out on type-based filtering. Ensure this behavior is intended. - Cross-component impact: Other components using
useChecksFetchmight need to pass theselectedMonitorTypeparameter to take advantage of the new feature. - Business logic considerations: Type-based filtering can help users monitor specific types of checks, improving the application's functionality.
- The PR introduces a new parameter
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const useChecksFetch = ({ selectedMonitor, selectedMonitorType = undefined, filter, dateRange, page, rowsPerPage }) => {
// ...
useEffect(() => {
// ...
const params = {
// ...
type: selectedMonitorType,
// ...
};
res = await networkService.getChecksByMonitor(params);
// ...
}, [user, dateRange, page, rowsPerPage, filter, selectedMonitor, selectedMonitorType]);
// ...
};-
Improvement rationale:
- Default
selectedMonitorTypetoundefinedto avoid potential null/undefined errors. - Use a single object
paramsto hold all query parameters, making the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
- Default
-
src/Pages/Incidents/Hooks/useMonitorsFetch.jsx - useMonitorsFetch
- Submitted PR Code:
if (res?.data?.data?.filteredMonitors?.length > 0) {
const monitorLookup = res.data.data.filteredMonitors.reduce((acc, monitor) => {
acc[monitor._id] = {
_id: monitor._id,
name: monitor.name,
type: monitor.type
};
return acc;
}, {});
setMonitors(monitorLookup);
}-
Analysis:
- The PR updates the
useMonitorsFetchhook to handle the newfilteredMonitorsresponse structure. - The
monitorLookupobject now includes thetypeproperty for each monitor. - Edge cases and error handling: Ensure that the old response structure (
monitors) is still handled gracefully, as the API might change over time. - Cross-component impact: Other components using
useMonitorsFetchmight need to access the newtypeproperty in themonitorslookup object. - Business logic considerations: The
typeproperty can help users filter and organize monitors based on their types.
- The PR updates the
-
LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
-
Improvement rationale: The current implementation already handles the new response structure gracefully.
-
src/Utils/NetworkService.js - getChecksByMonitor
- Submitted PR Code:
async getChecksByMonitor(config) {
const params = new URLSearchParams();
if (config.type) params.append("type", config.type);
// ...
}- Analysis:
- The PR updates the
getChecksByMonitormethod to accept an optionaltypeparameter. - The
typeparameter is appended to the query parameters only if it exists, preventing unnecessary query string clutter. - Edge cases and error handling: If the API endpoint does not accept the
typeparameter, ensure that the method handles this gracefully. - Cross-component impact: Other components using
getChecksByMonitorcan now pass thetypeparameter to filter checks by type. - Business logic considerations: Type-based filtering can help users monitor specific types of checks, improving the application's functionality.
- The PR updates the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: The current implementation already handles the new
typeparameter gracefully and efficiently.
Cross-cutting Concerns
- Data flow analysis: The changes introduce type-based filtering, enabling better data flow between the
Incidentspage, its hooks, and theNetworkService. - State management implications: The changes do not introduce new state management concerns.
- Error propagation paths: The changes introduce a new error case where
selectedMonitorTypemight not be provided, potentially missing out on type-based filtering. - Edge case handling across components: The changes require other components using the affected hooks and services to handle the new
typeproperty gracefully.
Algorithm & Data Structure Analysis
- Complexity analysis: The changes do not introduce new algorithmic complexities.
- Performance implications: The changes might introduce slight performance improvements due to more targeted API calls.
- Memory usage considerations: The changes do not introduce new memory usage concerns.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure: The changes maintain a clear and organized structure, with proper separation of concerns between hooks and services.
- Design patterns usage: The changes follow functional programming patterns, with hooks encapsulating reusable logic and services handling API interactions.
- Error handling approach: The changes introduce a new error case where
selectedMonitorTypemight not be provided, but the existing error handling approach is maintained. - Resource management: The changes do not introduce new resource management concerns.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
- 🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue description: The
useChecksFetchhook does not handle the case whereselectedMonitorTypeis not provided, potentially missing out on type-based filtering. - Impact: Users might not be able to filter checks by type if
selectedMonitorTypeis not provided. - Recommendation: Update the
useChecksFetchhook to handle the case whereselectedMonitorTypeis not provided gracefully, ensuring that type-based filtering is enabled by default.
- Issue description: The
- 🟡 Warnings
- Warning description: The
useMonitorsFetchhook assumes that the API response will always contain thefilteredMonitorsproperty, which might not always be the case. - Potential risks: If the API response structure changes, the
useMonitorsFetchhook might not handle it gracefully. - Suggested improvements: Update the
useMonitorsFetchhook to handle potential changes in the API response structure gracefully.
- Warning description: The
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects: The changes maintain good maintainability, with clear separation of concerns and proper encapsulation of reusable logic.
- Readability issues: The changes maintain good readability, with clear variable and function names and proper formatting.
- Performance bottlenecks: The changes do not introduce new performance bottlenecks.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: The changes do not introduce new authentication or authorization concerns.
- Data handling concerns: The changes do not introduce new data handling concerns.
- Input validation: The changes introduce a new input (
selectedMonitorType), which should be validated to prevent potential security risks. - Security best practices: The changes follow security best practices, with proper input validation and API interaction handling.
- Potential security risks: The changes do not introduce new potential security risks.
- Mitigation strategies: The changes follow best practices to mitigate potential security risks, with proper input validation and API interaction handling.
- Security testing requirements: The changes require security testing to ensure that the new input validation and API interaction handling work as intended.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis: The changes require unit tests to ensure that the new type-based filtering works as intended.
- Integration test requirements: The changes require integration tests to ensure that the new type-based filtering works correctly with the API.
- Edge cases coverage: The changes require edge case testing to ensure that the new type-based filtering works correctly in all scenarios.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Test case for useChecksFetch with selectedMonitorType
it('should fetch checks with selectedMonitorType', async () => {
const { result } = renderHook(() =>
useChecksFetch({
selectedMonitor: '123',
selectedMonitorType: 'type1',
filter: {},
dateRange: {},
page: 0,
rowsPerPage: 10,
})
);
await waitForNextUpdate();
expect(result.current.isLoading).toBe(false);
expect(result.current.networkError).toBe(false);
expect(result.current.checks).toEqual(expect.any(Array));
expect(result.current.checksCount).toEqual(expect.any(Number));
});
// Test case for useChecksFetch without selectedMonitorType
it('should fetch checks without selectedMonitorType', async () => {
const { result } = renderHook(() =>
useChecksFetch({
selectedMonitor: '123',
filter: {},
dateRange: {},
page: 0,
rowsPerPage: 10,
})
);
await waitForNextUpdate();
expect(result.current.isLoading).toBe(false);
expect(result.current.networkError).toBe(false);
expect(result.current.checks).toEqual(expect.any(Array));
expect(result.current.checksCount).toEqual(expect.any(Number));
});- Coverage improvements: The suggested test cases cover the new type-based filtering functionality introduced by the changes.
- Performance testing needs: The changes do not introduce new performance testing needs.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed: The changes require documentation updates to reflect the new type-based filtering functionality.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: The changes introduce new functionality that should be maintained and updated as needed.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: The changes do not introduce new technical debt or monitoring requirements.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The changes should be deployed as part of the regular deployment process, with proper testing and monitoring.
- Key operational considerations: The changes introduce new functionality that should be monitored and maintained as needed.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Update the
useChecksFetchhook to handle the case whereselectedMonitorTypeis not provided gracefully, ensuring that type-based filtering is enabled by default. - Update the
useMonitorsFetchhook to handle potential changes in the API response structure gracefully. - Implement unit tests, integration tests, and edge case tests to ensure that the new type-based filtering works as intended.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: The changes introduce type-based filtering, which can be further extended to support more advanced filtering capabilities.
- Business capability evolution: The changes improve the application's filtering capabilities, which can be further enhanced to support more advanced use cases.
- System integration impacts: The changes affect the
Incidentspage and its related hooks and services, with potential impacts on other components using these hooks and services.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
ajhollid
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
This was referenced Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
useChecksFetch:Added a new parameter selectedMonitorType to the function signature
Updated the networkService.getChecksByMonitor call to include the type parameter
Passed through the selectedMonitorType alongside other existing parameters
Incidents:Modified the useChecksFetch call to include selectedMonitorType
Updated the function call to pass selectedMonitorType from the monitors lookup object
NetworkService.js:Updated the getChecksByMonitor method to handle the new type parameter
Added a new condition to append the type to the URL parameters using URLSearchParams
Ensured the type is optional and only added if it exists
Issue number
#1844
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.