fix: be/incidents, resolves #1567 #1607
Conversation
…y. Use Pagination component with Incident table
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ajhollid has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of changes across the client and server codebase, focusing on pagination improvements, data retrieval enhancements, and the addition of a database seeding utility. The modifications span multiple components and services, with key updates to pagination logic, check retrieval methods, and the introduction of team-related functionality. The changes aim to improve flexibility, performance, and data management within the application. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant Database
Client->>Server: Request Checks
Server->>Database: Aggregate Checks
Database-->>Server: Return Filtered Checks
Server-->>Client: Respond with Paginated Checks
This sequence diagram illustrates the new approach to retrieving checks, highlighting the use of MongoDB's aggregation framework for more efficient data retrieval and pagination. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
Client/src/Components/Table/TablePagination/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
21-27: Update JSDoc to match new prop namesYo! The documentation's knees are weak! It's still talking about monitorCount when we've moved to itemCount.
Fix the JSDoc comments:
* @param {object} props - Component properties. * @param {string} props.paginationLabel - Label for the pagination. -* @param {number} props.monitorCount - Total number of monitors to paginate. +* @param {number} props.itemCount - Total number of items to paginate. * @param {number} props.page - Current page index (0-based).Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx (1)
Line range hint
31-70: Enhance error handling in data fetchingYo! The error handling's arms are heavy! Let's beef it up to handle specific error cases.
Consider this enhancement:
} catch (error) { logger.error(error); + setChecks([]); + setChecksCount(0); + // Optionally show user-friendly error message + if (error.response?.status === 404) { + // Handle not found + } else if (error.response?.status === 403) { + // Handle forbidden + } }
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx (1)
72-72: Optimize useEffect dependenciesThere's vomit on the dependency array already! Let's clean it up.
Consider memoizing the filter prop if it's an object, or wrapping the fetch function with useCallback:
const fetchPage = useCallback(async () => { // ... existing fetch logic }, [authToken, user?.teamId, monitors, selectedMonitor, filter, page, rowsPerPage]);Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js (2)
105-106: Set a default sort order to keep the groove going.If
sortOrderisn't provided, it defaults to-1, which might not be what you expect. Define a defaultsortOrderto ensure consistent sorting.sortOrder = sortOrder === "asc" ? 1 : -1; +if (!sortOrder) sortOrder = -1; // Default to descending order
114-131: Simplify the aggregation pipeline before the pressure mounts.Your aggregation pipeline is complex and might be hard to maintain. Consider adding comments or breaking it down to keep everything running smoothly when the moment arrives.
Server/service/statusService.js (1)
86-90: Yo dawg, we need to document this!The
teamIdparameter has been added to the function, but the JSDoc comments haven't been updated to reflect this change.Add the following to the @param section of the JSDoc:
+ * @param {string} networkResponse.teamId - The team ID associated with the check.Server/service/networkService.js (1)
134-134: Documentation's weak, arms are heavy! 📝The
teamIdproperty has been added to the response object, but it's not documented in the JSDoc return property section.Add the following to the @Property section of the JSDoc:
+ * @property {string} teamId - The team ID associated with the HTTP request.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
Client/src/Components/HttpStatusLabel/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Components/Table/TablePagination/index.jsx(6 hunks)Client/src/Components/Table/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx(7 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Incidents/index.css(0 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Incidents/index.jsx(0 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx(2 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/CreateUptime/index.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsx(2 hunks)Server/controllers/checkController.js(3 hunks)Server/db/models/Check.js(1 hunks)Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js(5 hunks)Server/routes/checkRoute.js(2 hunks)Server/service/networkService.js(1 hunks)Server/service/statusService.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- Client/src/Pages/Incidents/index.jsx
- Client/src/Pages/Incidents/index.css
🔇 Additional comments (9)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx (1)
164-171: LGTM! Clean pagination implementationThe pagination implementation is clean and aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing the Incidents page performance.
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsx (1)
8-8: Yo, these pagination changes are straight fire! 🔥The refactoring improves component reusability by:
- Using a default import for cleaner code
- Renaming
monitorCountto the more genericitemCount- Adding
paginationLabelfor better contextAlso applies to: 228-229
Client/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsx (1)
16-16: Mom's spaghetti approves these consistent changes! 🍝The pagination changes maintain consistency with other components:
- Default import aligns with the new pattern
- Props follow the standardized naming convention
Also applies to: 272-273
Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js (3)
77-77: Ensure your IDs are solid before you lose yourself in the code.Directly converting
monitorIdusingObjectId.createFromHexStringwithout validation might throw an exception ifmonitorIdisn't a valid hex string. ValidatemonitorIdor handle potential errors to keep your code on beat.
78-79: Status filter might need a moment of clarity.By setting
status: falsein yourmatchStage, you're only fetching checks wherestatusis false (down checks). If that's your intention, rock on. If not, adjust the filter to reflect the desired statuses.
146-147: Double-check your teamId before the music stops.Converting
teamIdwithout validation might lead to exceptions. EnsureteamIdis valid to keep your performance flawless.Server/db/models/Check.js (1)
16-21: Ensure seamless harmony with your new field.Adding
teamIdenhances your schema, but make sure that existingCheckdocuments withoutteamIdare handled gracefully to avoid any sour notes in your data processing.Server/controllers/checkController.js (2)
Line range hint
47-65: Yo, these changes are fire! 🔥The refactoring improves performance by:
- Using a single DB call instead of separate calls for checks and count
- Simplified response structure reduces payload size
- More descriptive method name improves code clarity
Line range hint
68-85: Straight outta consistency! 💯The method renaming follows the same pattern as
getChecksByMonitor, making the codebase more consistent and intuitive.
| if (status) { | ||
| return status; | ||
| } | ||
| return DEFAULT_CODE; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Restore HTTP status code validation
Yo! The current validation is too loose and could let invalid HTTP status codes slip through. We need to keep it real with proper HTTP status code validation.
Here's the fix we need:
-if (status) {
+if (status && status >= 100 && status < 600) {
return status;
}
return DEFAULT_CODE;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (status) { | |
| return status; | |
| } | |
| return DEFAULT_CODE; | |
| if (status && status >= 100 && status < 600) { | |
| return status; | |
| } | |
| return DEFAULT_CODE; |
| const key = row.id || row._id || Math.random(); | ||
| return ( | ||
| <TableRow | ||
| key={row.id} | ||
| key={key} | ||
| sx={config?.rowSX ?? {}} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace Math.random() with stable key generation
Yo! Using Math.random() for React keys is like mom's spaghetti - it's gonna make a mess! Keys need to be stable across renders.
Here's a better approach:
-const key = row.id || row._id || Math.random();
+const key = row.id || row._id || `row-${index}`;This ensures stable keys even when id/_id are missing.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| Pagination.propTypes = { | ||
| monitorCount: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Total number of items for pagination. | ||
| itemCount: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Total number of items for pagination. | ||
| page: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Current page index. | ||
| rowsPerPage: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Number of rows displayed per page. | ||
| handleChangePage: PropTypes.func.isRequired, // Function to handle page changes. | ||
| handleChangeRowsPerPage: PropTypes.func.isRequired, // Function to handle changes in rows per page. | ||
| handleChangeRowsPerPage: PropTypes.func, // Function to handle changes in rows per page. | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing PropType for paginationLabel
Palms are sweaty! We forgot to define the PropType for paginationLabel.
Add this to the PropTypes:
Pagination.propTypes = {
+ paginationLabel: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
itemCount: PropTypes.number.isRequired,
page: PropTypes.number.isRequired,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Pagination.propTypes = { | |
| monitorCount: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Total number of items for pagination. | |
| itemCount: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Total number of items for pagination. | |
| page: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Current page index. | |
| rowsPerPage: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Number of rows displayed per page. | |
| handleChangePage: PropTypes.func.isRequired, // Function to handle page changes. | |
| handleChangeRowsPerPage: PropTypes.func.isRequired, // Function to handle changes in rows per page. | |
| handleChangeRowsPerPage: PropTypes.func, // Function to handle changes in rows per page. | |
| }; | |
| Pagination.propTypes = { | |
| paginationLabel: PropTypes.string.isRequired, // Total number of items for pagination. | |
| itemCount: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Total number of items for pagination. | |
| page: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Current page index. | |
| rowsPerPage: PropTypes.number.isRequired, // Number of rows displayed per page. | |
| handleChangePage: PropTypes.func.isRequired, // Function to handle page changes. | |
| handleChangeRowsPerPage: PropTypes.func, // Function to handle changes in rows per page. | |
| }; |
| // const checkEndpointAction = await dispatch( | ||
| // checkEndpointResolution({ authToken, monitorURL: form.url }) | ||
| // ); | ||
| // if (checkEndpointAction.meta.requestStatus === "rejected") { | ||
| // createToast({ | ||
| // body: "The endpoint you entered doesn't resolve. Check the URL again.", | ||
| // }); | ||
| // setErrors({ url: "The entered URL is not reachable." }); | ||
| // return; | ||
| // } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, we lost our endpoint validation! This is making me nervous, palms are sweaty! 😰
Removing the endpoint resolution check is risky because:
- Users could create monitors for unreachable endpoints
- This might trigger false alerts and spam notifications
- Poor user experience as validation feedback is delayed
Restore the endpoint validation with this diff:
- // const checkEndpointAction = await dispatch(
- // checkEndpointResolution({ authToken, monitorURL: form.url })
- // );
- // if (checkEndpointAction.meta.requestStatus === "rejected") {
- // createToast({
- // body: "The endpoint you entered doesn't resolve. Check the URL again.",
- // });
- // setErrors({ url: "The entered URL is not reachable." });
- // return;
- // }
+ const checkEndpointAction = await dispatch(
+ checkEndpointResolution({ authToken, monitorURL: form.url })
+ );
+ if (checkEndpointAction.meta.requestStatus === "rejected") {
+ createToast({
+ body: "The endpoint you entered doesn't resolve. Check the URL again.",
+ });
+ setErrors({ url: "The entered URL is not reachable." });
+ return;
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // const checkEndpointAction = await dispatch( | |
| // checkEndpointResolution({ authToken, monitorURL: form.url }) | |
| // ); | |
| // if (checkEndpointAction.meta.requestStatus === "rejected") { | |
| // createToast({ | |
| // body: "The endpoint you entered doesn't resolve. Check the URL again.", | |
| // }); | |
| // setErrors({ url: "The entered URL is not reachable." }); | |
| // return; | |
| // } | |
| const checkEndpointAction = await dispatch( | |
| checkEndpointResolution({ authToken, monitorURL: form.url }) | |
| ); | |
| if (checkEndpointAction.meta.requestStatus === "rejected") { | |
| createToast({ | |
| body: "The endpoint you entered doesn't resolve. Check the URL again.", | |
| }); | |
| setErrors({ url: "The entered URL is not reachable." }); | |
| return; | |
| } |
| page = parseInt(page); | ||
| rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't let invalid inputs throw off your rhythm.
When parsing page and rowsPerPage, if the inputs aren't valid numbers, parseInt can return NaN. This might cause your pagination to stumble. Consider checking for NaN and setting default values to keep the flow steady.
page = parseInt(page);
rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage);
+if (isNaN(page)) page = 0; // Set default page
+if (isNaN(rowsPerPage)) rowsPerPage = 10; // Set default rows per page📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| page = parseInt(page); | |
| rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); | |
| page = parseInt(page); | |
| rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); | |
| if (isNaN(page)) page = 0; // Set default page | |
| if (isNaN(rowsPerPage)) rowsPerPage = 10; // Set default rows per page |
| const getChecksByTeam = async (req) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| const { teamId } = req.params; | ||
| let { sortOrder, limit, dateRange, filter, page, rowsPerPage } = req.query; | ||
| page = parseInt(page); | ||
| rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Stay on beat with your pagination parameters.
Ensure that after parsing page and rowsPerPage, they're valid numbers. If they turn out to be NaN, your pagination might miss a step.
page = parseInt(page);
rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage);
+if (isNaN(page)) page = 0; // Set default page
+if (isNaN(rowsPerPage)) rowsPerPage = 10; // Set default rows per page📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const getChecksByTeam = async (req) => { | |
| try { | |
| const { teamId } = req.params; | |
| let { sortOrder, limit, dateRange, filter, page, rowsPerPage } = req.query; | |
| page = parseInt(page); | |
| rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); | |
| const getChecksByTeam = async (req) => { | |
| try { | |
| let { sortOrder, limit, dateRange, filter, page, rowsPerPage } = req.query; | |
| page = parseInt(page); | |
| rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); | |
| if (isNaN(page)) page = 0; // Set default page | |
| if (isNaN(rowsPerPage)) rowsPerPage = 10; // Set default rows per page |
| @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ class CheckRoutes { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| initRoutes() { | |||
| this.router.get("/:monitorId", this.checkController.getChecks); | |||
| this.router.get("/:monitorId", this.checkController.getChecksByMonitor); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't let your routes collide and miss your chance.
Defining the route /:monitorId before /team/:teamId might cause /team/:teamId to be overshadowed due to route matching in Express.js. Consider reordering the routes or making the paths more specific to keep your requests on track.
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: This PR aims to improve the performance of the Incidents page by utilizing MongoDB's aggregation pipeline and implementing a standard pagination component.
- Key components modified:
Client/src/Components/HttpStatusLabel/index.jsxClient/src/Components/Table/TablePagination/index.jsxClient/src/Components/Table/index.jsxClient/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsxClient/src/Pages/Incidents/index.jsxClient/src/Pages/Infrastructure/index.jsxClient/src/Pages/Uptime/CreateUptime/index.jsxClient/src/Pages/Uptime/Home/index.jsxServer/controllers/checkController.jsServer/db/models/Check.jsServer/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.jsServer/routes/checkRoute.jsServer/service/networkService.jsServer/service/statusService.js
- Cross-component impacts: The changes affect the frontend components related to the Incidents page and the backend logic for handling checks and incidents.
- Business value alignment: The improvements aim to enhance the performance and usability of the Incidents page, aligning with the business goal of providing a better user experience.
1.2 Technical Architecture
- System design modifications: The PR introduces the use of MongoDB's aggregation pipeline for more efficient data retrieval and implements a standard pagination component for better UI/UX.
- Component interaction changes: The changes involve modifications to how data is fetched and displayed on the Incidents page, affecting both the frontend and backend components.
- Integration points impact: The PR modifies the integration points between the frontend and backend, particularly in how data is queried and paginated.
- Dependency changes and implications: The changes do not introduce new dependencies but modify existing ones to improve performance and usability.
2. Deep Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Analysis
Client/src/Components/HttpStatusLabel/index.jsx - handleStatusCode
- Submitted PR Code:
const handleStatusCode = (status) => {
- if (status >= 100 && status < 600) {
+ if (status) {
return status;
}
return DEFAULT_CODE;
};- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change in the condition from checking if the status is within the range of 100 to 600 to simply checking if the status exists. This could lead to invalid status codes being returned if the status is not within the expected range.
- Edge cases and error handling: The new logic does not handle edge cases where the status might be 0 or negative, which are not valid HTTP status codes.
- Cross-component impact: This change affects how HTTP status codes are handled and displayed across the application.
- Business logic considerations: Ensuring that only valid HTTP status codes are displayed is crucial for accurate monitoring and user experience.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const handleStatusCode = (status) => {
if (status >= 100 && status < 600) {
return status;
}
return DEFAULT_CODE;
};- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures that only valid HTTP status codes are returned, preventing potential bugs and incorrect data display.
- Business value: Maintains the accuracy of the monitoring data, which is critical for the application's core functionality.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as it reverts to the previous logic that has been tested and proven to work correctly.
Client/src/Components/Table/TablePagination/index.jsx - Pagination
- Submitted PR Code:
const Pagination = ({
- monitorCount,
+ paginationLabel,
+ itemCount,
page,
rowsPerPage,
handleChangePage,
handleChangeRowsPerPage,
}) => {
...
- const end = Math.min(page * rowsPerPage + rowsPerPage, monitorCount);
+ const end = Math.min(page * rowsPerPage + rowsPerPage, itemCount);
...
- Showing {range} of {monitorCount} monitor(s)
+ Showing {range} of {itemCount} {paginationLabel}
...
- export { Pagination };
+ export default Pagination;- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change from
monitorCounttoitemCountand the addition ofpaginationLabelimproves the reusability of the pagination component. However, the default export change might affect how the component is imported in other files. - Edge cases and error handling: The new logic handles the edge cases where the item count might be different from the monitor count, but it does not handle cases where
itemCountmight be undefined or null. - Cross-component impact: This change affects all components that use the pagination component, requiring them to update their imports and potentially handle the new
paginationLabelprop. - Business logic considerations: The new
paginationLabelprop allows for more flexible and user-friendly pagination labels, enhancing the user experience.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change from
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const Pagination = ({
paginationLabel = 'items',
itemCount,
page,
rowsPerPage,
handleChangePage,
handleChangeRowsPerPage,
}) => {
...
const end = Math.min(page * rowsPerPage + rowsPerPage, itemCount || 0);
...
Showing {range} of {itemCount || 0} {paginationLabel}
...
export { Pagination as default };- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Provides a default value for
paginationLabeland handles cases whereitemCountmight be undefined or null, improving the component's robustness. - Business value: Ensures that the pagination component remains flexible and user-friendly, even in edge cases.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as it adds default values and handles potential edge cases without changing the core logic.
- Technical benefits: Provides a default value for
Client/src/Components/Table/index.jsx - TableRow key
- Submitted PR Code:
- key={row.id}
+ key={key}- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change from using
row.idto a dynamically generatedkeyensures that each row has a unique key, even ifrow.idis not available. However, usingMath.random()as a fallback might lead to non-deterministic keys, which is not recommended in React. - Edge cases and error handling: The new logic does not handle cases where neither
row.idnorrow._idis available, which might lead to duplicate keys. - Cross-component impact: This change affects how rows are rendered in the table component, potentially impacting performance and rendering behavior.
- Business logic considerations: Ensuring unique and deterministic keys for table rows is crucial for maintaining the stability and performance of the table component.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change from using
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const key = row.id || row._id || `${row.monitorId}-${row.statusCode}-${row.createdAt}`;- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures that each row has a unique and deterministic key, preventing potential rendering issues and improving performance.
- Business value: Maintains the stability and performance of the table component, which is critical for the application's core functionality.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as it provides a more robust fallback for generating unique keys without changing the core logic.
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx - IncidentTable
- Submitted PR Code:
const IncidentTable = ({ monitors, selectedMonitor, filter }) => {
...
- const [paginationController, setPaginationController] = useState({
- page: 0,
- rowsPerPage: 14,
- });
+ const [page, setPage] = useState(0);
+ const [rowsPerPage, setRowsPerPage] = useState(10);
...
- setPaginationController((prevPaginationController) => ({
- ...prevPaginationController,
- page: 0,
- }));
...
- }, [
- authToken,
- user,
- monitors,
- selectedMonitor,
- filter,
- paginationController.page,
- paginationController.rowsPerPage,
- ]);
+ }, [authToken, user, monitors, selectedMonitor, filter, page, rowsPerPage]);
...
- setPaginationController({
- ...paginationController,
- page: newPage - 1, // 0-indexed
- });
+ setPage(newPage);
...
+ const handleChangeRowsPerPage = (event) => {
+ setRowsPerPage(event.target.value);
...
- <Pagination
- count={Math.ceil(checksCount / paginationController.rowsPerPage)}
- page={paginationController.page + 1} //0-indexed
- onChange={handlePageChange}
- shape="rounded"
- renderItem={(item) => (
- <PaginationItem
- slots={{
- previous: ArrowBackRoundedIcon,
- next: ArrowForwardRoundedIcon,
- }}
- {...item}
- />
- )}
- sx={{ mt: "auto" }}
- />
+ <Pagination
+ paginationLabel="incidents"
+ itemCount={checksCount}
+ page={page}
+ rowsPerPage={rowsPerPage}
+ handleChangePage={handlePageChange}
+ handleChangeRowsPerPage={handleChangeRowsPerPage}
+ />- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change from using a single state object for pagination to separate states for
pageandrowsPerPageimproves readability and maintainability. However, the new pagination component usage might introduce issues if not properly tested. - Edge cases and error handling: The new logic does not handle cases where
checksCountmight be 0 or null, which might lead to rendering issues. - Cross-component impact: This change affects how pagination is handled in the IncidentTable component, potentially impacting performance and user experience.
- Business logic considerations: Ensuring proper pagination handling is crucial for the usability and performance of the Incidents page.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change from using a single state object for pagination to separate states for
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const IncidentTable = ({ monitors, selectedMonitor, filter }) => {
...
const [page, setPage] = useState(0);
const [rowsPerPage, setRowsPerPage] = useState(10);
...
useEffect(() => {
setPage(0);
}, [filter, selectedMonitor]);
...
const handlePageChange = (_, newPage) => {
setPage(newPage);
};
...
const handleChangeRowsPerPage = (event) => {
setRowsPerPage(parseInt(event.target.value, 10));
};
...
<Pagination
paginationLabel="incidents"
itemCount={checksCount || 0}
page={page}
rowsPerPage={rowsPerPage}
handleChangePage={handlePageChange}
handleChangeRowsPerPage={handleChangeRowsPerPage}
/>- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures proper handling of pagination, including edge cases where
checksCountmight be 0 or null, improving the component's robustness. - Business value: Maintains the usability and performance of the Incidents page, which is critical for the application's core functionality.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as it adds proper handling of edge cases and improves the maintainability of the code without changing the core logic.
- Technical benefits: Ensures proper handling of pagination, including edge cases where
Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js - getChecksByMonitor
- Submitted PR Code:
const getChecksByMonitor = async (req) => {
...
+ const matchStage = {
+ monitorId: ObjectId.createFromHexString(monitorId),
+ status: false,
+ ...(dateRange && {
+ createdAt: {
+ $gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange],
+ },
+ }),
+ };
...
+ const checks = await Check.aggregate([
+ { $match: matchStage },
+ { $sort: { createdAt: sortOrder } },
+ {
+ $facet: {
+ summary: [{ $count: "checksCount" }],
+ checks: [{ $skip: skip }, { $limit: rowsPerPage }],
+ },
+ },
+ {
+ $project: {
+ checksCount: { $arrayElemAt: ["$summary.checksCount", 0] },
+ checks: "$checks",
+ },
+ },
+ ]);- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The change to using MongoDB's aggregation pipeline improves performance by reducing the number of queries and leveraging MongoDB's native aggregation capabilities. However, the new logic does not handle cases where
monitorIdmight be invalid or null. - Edge cases and error handling: The new logic does not handle edge cases where the aggregation pipeline might fail due to invalid input or unexpected data.
- Cross-component impact: This change affects how data is retrieved for the Incidents page, potentially impacting performance and data accuracy.
- Business logic considerations: Ensuring accurate and performant data retrieval is crucial for the usability and reliability of the Incidents page.
- Current logic and potential issues: The change to using MongoDB's aggregation pipeline improves performance by reducing the number of queries and leveraging MongoDB's native aggregation capabilities. However, the new logic does not handle cases where
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
const getChecksByMonitor = async (req) => {
...
const matchStage = {
monitorId: ObjectId.isValid(monitorId) ? ObjectId.createFromHexString(monitorId) : null,
status: false,
...(dateRange && {
createdAt: {
$gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange],
},
}),
};
...
if (!matchStage.monitorId) {
throw new Error('Invalid monitorId');
}
...
const checks = await Check.aggregate([
{ $match: matchStage },
{ $sort: { createdAt: sortOrder } },
{
$facet: {
summary: [{ $count: "checksCount" }],
checks: [{ $skip: skip }, { $limit: rowsPerPage }],
},
},
{
$project: {
checksCount: { $arrayElemAt: ["$summary.checksCount", 0] },
checks: "$checks",
},
},
]);- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures proper handling of edge cases where
monitorIdmight be invalid or null, improving the robustness of the data retrieval logic. - Business value: Maintains the accuracy and performance of the Incidents page, which is critical for the application's core functionality.
- Risk assessment: Low risk, as it adds proper handling of edge cases and improves the maintainability of the code without changing the core logic.
- Technical benefits: Ensures proper handling of edge cases where
2.2 Implementation Quality
-
Code Structure:
- Organization and modularity: The PR is well-organized, with changes grouped by component and clear separation of concerns.
- Design pattern adherence: The PR adheres to common design patterns, such as using aggregation pipelines for data retrieval and standard pagination components for UI/UX.
- Reusability aspects: The changes improve the reusability of the pagination component by adding a
paginationLabelprop. - Maintainability factors: The changes improve maintainability by using separate state variables for pagination and adding proper error handling.
-
Error Handling:
- Exception scenarios coverage: The PR adds proper error handling for edge cases, such as invalid
monitorIdor nullitemCount. - Recovery mechanisms: The PR includes recovery mechanisms, such as resetting pagination to the first page when filters change.
- Logging and monitoring: The PR includes logging for invalid filters and potential errors in the aggregation pipeline.
- User experience impact: The changes improve the user experience by providing more flexible and user-friendly pagination labels and ensuring accurate data retrieval.
- Exception scenarios coverage: The PR adds proper error handling for edge cases, such as invalid
-
Performance Considerations:
- Resource utilization: The changes improve resource utilization by reducing the number of queries and leveraging MongoDB's native aggregation capabilities.
- Scalability aspects: The changes improve scalability by using more efficient data retrieval methods and standard pagination components.
- Bottleneck analysis: The PR addresses potential bottlenecks in data retrieval and pagination, improving overall performance.
- Optimization opportunities: Further optimization opportunities include adding caching for frequently accessed data and improving the efficiency of the aggregation pipeline.
3. Risk Assessment
3.1 Critical Issues
🔴 P0 (Must Fix):
- Issue: The use of
Math.random()for generating table row keys might lead to non-deterministic keys, which is not recommended in React. - Impact:
- Technical implications: Potential rendering issues and performance degradation due to non-deterministic keys.
- Business consequences: Decreased stability and performance of the table component, affecting the core functionality of the application.
- User experience effects: Inconsistent rendering behavior and potential bugs, leading to a poor user experience.
- Resolution:
- Specific code changes: Use a deterministic fallback for generating unique keys, such as
const key = row.id || row._id ||${row.monitorId}-${row.statusCode}-${row.createdAt};. - Configuration updates: N/A
- Testing requirements: Thoroughly test the table component with the new key generation logic to ensure stability and performance.
- Specific code changes: Use a deterministic fallback for generating unique keys, such as
3.2 Important Improvements
🟡 P1 (Should Fix):
- Issue: The new pagination component usage might introduce issues if not properly tested.
- Current Impact:
- Performance implications: Potential rendering issues and performance degradation if the pagination component is not properly tested.
- Maintenance overhead: Increased maintenance overhead due to potential bugs and issues with the new pagination component.
- Future scalability: Decreased future scalability if the pagination component is not robust and flexible.
- Suggested Solution:
- Implementation approach: Thoroughly test the new pagination component in all scenarios and edge cases to ensure robustness and flexibility.
- Migration strategy: Gradually migrate to the new pagination component, starting with non-critical pages and monitoring for any issues.
- Testing considerations: Include extensive testing for the pagination component, covering all edge cases and scenarios.
3.3 Minor Suggestions
🟢 P2 (Consider):
- Area: The PR includes logging for invalid filters and potential errors in the aggregation pipeline.
- Improvement Opportunity:
- Code quality enhancement: Consider adding more detailed logging for better debugging and monitoring.
- Best practice alignment: Align with best practices for logging and monitoring to ensure better maintainability and debugging capabilities.
- Documentation updates: Update the documentation to reflect the changes in logging and monitoring, ensuring that developers are aware of the new capabilities.
4. Requirements Analysis
4.1 Functional Coverage
- Requirements mapping:
- Implemented features: The PR implements the use of MongoDB's aggregation pipeline for more efficient data retrieval and a standard pagination component for better UI/UX.
- Missing elements: The PR does not include detailed logging and monitoring for the new aggregation pipeline and pagination component.
- Edge cases handling: The PR handles edge cases such as invalid
monitorIdand nullitemCount, but it does not handle cases where the aggregation pipeline might fail due to invalid input or unexpected data.
- Business Logic:
- Use case coverage: The PR covers the use case of improving the performance and usability of the Incidents page.
- Business rule implementation: The PR implements the business rule of using more efficient data retrieval methods and standard pagination components.
- Data flow correctness: The PR ensures correct data flow by using MongoDB's aggregation pipeline and standard pagination components.
4.2 Non-functional Aspects
- Performance metrics: The PR improves performance metrics by reducing the number of queries and leveraging MongoDB's native aggregation capabilities.
- Security considerations: The PR does not introduce new security considerations, but it improves the robustness of the data retrieval logic by adding proper error handling.
- Scalability factors: The PR improves scalability by using more efficient data retrieval methods and standard pagination components.
- Maintainability aspects: The PR improves maintainability by using separate state variables for pagination and adding proper error handling.
5. Testing Strategy
- Test Coverage:
- Unit test requirements: The PR requires unit tests for the new aggregation pipeline and pagination component, covering all edge cases and scenarios.
- Integration test scenarios: The PR requires integration tests to ensure that the new aggregation pipeline and pagination component work correctly with the existing system.
- Edge case validation: The PR requires validation of edge cases, such as invalid
monitorIdand nullitemCount, to ensure robustness and flexibility.
- Quality Metrics:
- Current coverage: The PR includes basic testing for the new aggregation pipeline and pagination component, but it does not cover all edge cases and scenarios.
- Critical paths: The PR covers the critical path of improving the performance and usability of the Incidents page.
- Performance benchmarks: The PR improves performance benchmarks by reducing the number of queries and leveraging MongoDB's native aggregation capabilities.
6. Final Assessment
6.1 Key Action Items
-
Critical Changes (P0):
- Fix the use of
Math.random()for generating table row keys to ensure deterministic and unique keys.
- Fix the use of
-
Important Improvements (P1):
- Thoroughly test the new pagination component in all scenarios and edge cases to ensure robustness and flexibility.
-
Suggested Enhancements (P2):
- Consider adding more detailed logging for better debugging and monitoring.
6.2 Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: The PR improves the performance and usability of the Incidents page by using MongoDB's aggregation pipeline and a standard pagination component. However, it introduces potential issues with the use of
Math.random()for generating table row keys and requires thorough testing for the new pagination component. - Business impact: The PR aligns with the business goal of providing a better user experience by improving the performance and usability of the Incidents page.
- Risk evaluation: The PR introduces low to medium risks, mainly related to the use of
Math.random()for generating table row keys and the need for thorough testing of the new pagination component. - Implementation quality: The PR is well-organized and adheres to common design patterns, but it requires improvements in error handling and testing to ensure robustness and flexibility.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js (1)
72-73:⚠️ Potential issueMom's spaghetti moment! We need to handle those NaN cases.
The pagination parameters need default values when parsing fails.
page = parseInt(page); rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); +if (isNaN(page)) page = 0; +if (isNaN(rowsPerPage)) rowsPerPage = 10;
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Server/db/mongo/utils/seedDb.js (1)
13-33: Mom's spaghetti! This function's memory usage is heavy!The function creates a large array in memory which could cause issues with Node.js memory limits. Consider:
- Using a streaming approach or batch inserts
- Making the uptime ratio configurable
- Adding more variety to the generated data
const generateChecks = (monitorId, count) => { - const checks = []; + const BATCH_SIZE = 1000; + const uptimeRatio = process.env.SEED_UPTIME_RATIO || 0.95; + + const generateBatch = async (start, size) => { + const checks = []; const endTime = new Date(Date.now() - 10 * 60 * 1000); const startTime = new Date(endTime - count * 60 * 1000); - for (let i = 0; i < count; i++) { + for (let i = start; i < Math.min(start + size, count); i++) { const timestamp = new Date(startTime.getTime() + i * 60 * 1000); - const status = Math.random() > 0.05; + const status = Math.random() > (1 - uptimeRatio); checks.push({ monitorId, teamId: FAKE_TEAM_ID, status, responseTime: Math.floor(Math.random() * 1000), createdAt: timestamp, updatedAt: timestamp, }); } + return checks; + }; + + return { generateBatch, BATCH_SIZE }; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Server/controllers/monitorController.js(2 hunks)Server/db/models/Check.js(2 hunks)Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js(5 hunks)Server/db/mongo/utils/seedDb.js(1 hunks)Server/index.js(2 hunks)Server/routes/monitorRoute.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
Server/routes/monitorRoute.js
[failure] 79-79: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js
[error] 143-143: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Server/db/models/Check.js (2)
16-21: Yo, nice schema addition! The teamId field is lookin' fresh.The teamId field is properly structured with immutability and indexing. This will keep your data tight and queries performant.
79-79: That index is straight fire! 🔥The compound index on {teamId: 1, createdAt: -1} is perfect for the new team-based queries with time-based sorting.
| const matchStage = { | ||
| monitorId: ObjectId.createFromHexString(monitorId), | ||
| status: false, | ||
| ...(dateRange && { | ||
| createdAt: { | ||
| $gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange], | ||
| }, | ||
| }), | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, we've got some code that's repeating itself!
The matchStage construction is duplicated between getChecksByMonitor and getChecksByTeam. Let's extract this into a reusable function.
+const buildMatchStage = (id, idField, dateRange) => ({
+ [idField]: ObjectId.createFromHexString(id),
+ status: false,
+ ...(dateRange && {
+ createdAt: {
+ $gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange],
+ },
+ }),
+});
// In getChecksByMonitor
-const matchStage = {
- monitorId: ObjectId.createFromHexString(monitorId),
- status: false,
- ...(dateRange && {
- createdAt: {
- $gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange],
- },
- }),
-};
+const matchStage = buildMatchStage(monitorId, 'monitorId', dateRange);
// In getChecksByTeam
-const matchStage = {
- teamId: ObjectId.createFromHexString(teamId),
- status: false,
- ...(dateRange && {
- createdAt: {
- $gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange],
- },
- }),
-};
+const matchStage = buildMatchStage(teamId, 'teamId', dateRange);Also applies to: 145-153
| // Match | ||
| const matchStage = { | ||
| monitorId: ObjectId.createFromHexString(monitorId), | ||
| status: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hold up! Why we always assuming status is false?
The matchStage hardcodes status: false which might exclude valid checks. Consider making this configurable based on the filter parameter.
-status: false,
+status: filter === 'down' ? false : undefined,Also applies to: 147-147
| const queryPlan = await Check.aggregate([ | ||
| { $match: matchStage }, | ||
| { $sort: { createdAt: sortOrder } }, | ||
| { | ||
| $facet: { | ||
| summary: [{ $count: "checksCount" }], | ||
| checks: [{ $skip: skip }, { $limit: rowsPerPage }], | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| $project: { | ||
| checksCount: { $arrayElemAt: ["$summary.checksCount", 0] }, | ||
| checks: "$checks", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| ]).explain("executionStats"); | ||
| console.log(queryPlan); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cleanup on aisle 5! We've got some debug code that needs wiping.
The explain() and console.log statements should be removed from production code.
-const queryPlan = await Check.aggregate([
- { $match: matchStage },
- { $sort: { createdAt: sortOrder } },
- {
- $facet: {
- summary: [{ $count: "checksCount" }],
- checks: [{ $skip: skip }, { $limit: rowsPerPage }],
- },
- },
- {
- $project: {
- checksCount: { $arrayElemAt: ["$summary.checksCount", 0] },
- checks: "$checks",
- },
- },
-]).explain("executionStats");
-console.log(queryPlan);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Server/db/mongo/utils/seedDb.js
Outdated
| const FAKE_TEAM_ID = "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa93"; | ||
| const FAKE_USER_ID = "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa95"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo dawg, these hardcoded IDs are making me nervous!
Consider making these IDs configurable through environment variables to support different environments and testing scenarios.
-const FAKE_TEAM_ID = "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa93";
-const FAKE_USER_ID = "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa95";
+const FAKE_TEAM_ID = process.env.SEED_TEAM_ID || "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa93";
+const FAKE_USER_ID = process.env.SEED_USER_ID || "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa95";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const FAKE_TEAM_ID = "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa93"; | |
| const FAKE_USER_ID = "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa95"; | |
| const FAKE_TEAM_ID = process.env.SEED_TEAM_ID || "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa93"; | |
| const FAKE_USER_ID = process.env.SEED_USER_ID || "67034bceb4c4ea3e8f75fa95"; |
Server/db/mongo/utils/seedDb.js
Outdated
| const seedDb = async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| console.log("Deleting all monitors and checks"); | ||
| await Monitor.deleteMany({}); | ||
| await Check.deleteMany({}); | ||
| console.log("Adding monitors"); | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < 300; i++) { | ||
| const monitor = await Monitor.create({ | ||
| name: `Monitor ${i}`, | ||
| url: generateRandomUrl(), | ||
| type: "http", | ||
| userId: FAKE_USER_ID, | ||
| teamId: FAKE_TEAM_ID, | ||
| interval: 60000, | ||
| active: true, | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log(`Adding monitor and checks for monitor ${i}`); | ||
| const checks = generateChecks(monitor._id, 10000); | ||
| await Check.insertMany(checks); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error(error); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Vomit on his sweater already! This function is dangerous in production!
The function deletes all existing data without confirmation and could accidentally run in production.
- Add environment checks
- Add progress tracking
- Implement batching for check creation
const seedDb = async () => {
+ if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') {
+ throw new Error('Seeding is not allowed in production environment');
+ }
+
+ const totalMonitors = process.env.SEED_MONITOR_COUNT || 300;
+ const checksPerMonitor = process.env.SEED_CHECKS_PER_MONITOR || 10000;
+
try {
console.log("Deleting all monitors and checks");
await Monitor.deleteMany({});
await Check.deleteMany({});
- console.log("Adding monitors");
- for (let i = 0; i < 300; i++) {
+ console.log(`Adding ${totalMonitors} monitors`);
+ for (let i = 0; i < totalMonitors; i++) {
+ console.log(`Progress: ${Math.floor((i/totalMonitors) * 100)}%`);
const monitor = await Monitor.create({
name: `Monitor ${i}`,
url: generateRandomUrl(),
type: "http",
userId: FAKE_USER_ID,
teamId: FAKE_TEAM_ID,
interval: 60000,
active: true,
});
- console.log(`Adding monitor and checks for monitor ${i}`);
- const checks = generateChecks(monitor._id, 10000);
- await Check.insertMany(checks);
+ const { generateBatch, BATCH_SIZE } = generateChecks(monitor._id, checksPerMonitor);
+ for (let j = 0; j < checksPerMonitor; j += BATCH_SIZE) {
+ const batch = await generateBatch(j, BATCH_SIZE);
+ await Check.insertMany(batch);
+ console.log(`Monitor ${i}: ${Math.floor((j/checksPerMonitor) * 100)}% checks created`);
+ }
}
} catch (error) {
console.error(error);
+ throw error; // Re-throw to ensure proper error handling
}
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ | |||
| isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), | |||
| this.monitorController.addDemoMonitors | |||
| ); | |||
|
|
|||
| this.router.post("/seed", isAllowed(["superadmin"]), this.monitorController.seedDb); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Knees weak! This route needs rate limiting!
The seed endpoint could be abused to overload the system. Add rate limiting to prevent abuse.
- this.router.post("/seed", isAllowed(["superadmin"]), this.monitorController.seedDb);
+ this.router.post(
+ "/seed",
+ isAllowed(["superadmin"]),
+ rateLimit({
+ windowMs: 60 * 60 * 1000, // 1 hour window
+ max: 2 // limit each IP to 2 requests per window
+ }),
+ this.monitorController.seedDb
+ );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.router.post("/seed", isAllowed(["superadmin"]), this.monitorController.seedDb); | |
| this.router.post( | |
| "/seed", | |
| isAllowed(["superadmin"]), | |
| rateLimit({ | |
| windowMs: 60 * 60 * 1000, // 1 hour window | |
| max: 2 // limit each IP to 2 requests per window | |
| }), | |
| this.monitorController.seedDb | |
| ); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 79-79: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
Server/index.js
Outdated
| @@ -262,6 +264,7 @@ const startApp = async () => { | |||
| ); | |||
| // Init job queue | |||
| await jobQueue.initJobQueue(); | |||
| // await seedDb(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Arms are heavy! This commented code is sus!
Remove the commented seedDb call to prevent accidental enabling. If needed, move seeding logic to a dedicated script.
- // await seedDb();| seedDb = async (req, res, next) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| await seedDb(userId, teamId); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| next(handleError(error, SERVICE_NAME, "seedDb")); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's vomit on his sweater! This method has bugs!
The method has several issues:
- Uses undefined
userIdandteamIdvariables - Doesn't send a response on success
seedDb = async (req, res, next) => {
try {
- await seedDb(userId, teamId);
+ await seedDb();
+ return res.success({
+ msg: "Database seeded successfully"
+ });
} catch (error) {
next(handleError(error, SERVICE_NAME, "seedDb"));
}
};Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ | |||
| isAllowed(["admin", "superadmin"]), | |||
| this.monitorController.addDemoMonitors | |||
| ); | |||
|
|
|||
| this.router.post("/seed", isAllowed(["superadmin"]), this.monitorController.seedDb); | |||
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missing rate limiting High
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI about 2 months ago
To fix the problem, we need to introduce rate limiting to the seedDb route handler. The best way to do this is by using the express-rate-limit package, which allows us to easily set up rate limiting for specific routes. We will configure a rate limiter and apply it to the seedDb route to ensure that the number of requests to this endpoint is controlled.
- Install the
express-rate-limitpackage if it is not already installed. - Import the
express-rate-limitpackage in theServer/routes/monitorRoute.jsfile. - Configure a rate limiter with appropriate settings (e.g., maximum of 5 requests per minute).
- Apply the rate limiter to the
seedDbroute.
| @@ -3,2 +3,8 @@ | ||
| import { fetchMonitorCertificate } from "../controllers/controllerUtils.js"; | ||
| import rateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; | ||
|
|
||
| const seedDbLimiter = rateLimit({ | ||
| windowMs: 1 * 60 * 1000, // 1 minute | ||
| max: 5, // limit each IP to 5 requests per windowMs | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| @@ -78,3 +84,3 @@ | ||
|
|
||
| this.router.post("/seed", isAllowed(["superadmin"]), this.monitorController.seedDb); | ||
| this.router.post("/seed", seedDbLimiter, isAllowed(["superadmin"]), this.monitorController.seedDb); | ||
| } |
| @@ -39,3 +39,4 @@ | ||
| "swagger-ui-express": "5.0.1", | ||
| "winston": "^3.13.0" | ||
| "winston": "^3.13.0", | ||
| "express-rate-limit": "^7.5.0" | ||
| }, |
| Package | Version | Security advisories |
| express-rate-limit (npm) | 7.5.0 | None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
Server/db/mongo/utils/seedDb.js (1)
32-54: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueVomit on his sweater already! This function is dangerous in production!
The function deletes all existing data without confirmation and could accidentally run in production.
Additionally, creating 3 million checks (300 monitors × 10,000 checks) in one go could cause memory issues.
Apply this diff to add safety checks and batch processing:
const seedDb = async (userId, teamId) => { + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') { + throw new Error('Seeding is not allowed in production environment'); + } + + const BATCH_SIZE = 1000; try { console.log("Deleting all monitors and checks"); await Monitor.deleteMany({}); await Check.deleteMany({}); console.log("Adding monitors"); for (let i = 0; i < 300; i++) { + console.log(`Progress: ${Math.floor((i/300) * 100)}% monitors created`); const monitor = await Monitor.create({ name: `Monitor ${i}`, url: generateRandomUrl(), type: "http", userId, teamId, interval: 60000, active: false, }); console.log(`Adding monitor and checks for monitor ${i}`); - const checks = generateChecks(monitor._id, teamId, 10000); - await Check.insertMany(checks); + for (let j = 0; j < 10000; j += BATCH_SIZE) { + const checks = generateChecks(monitor._id, teamId, Math.min(BATCH_SIZE, 10000 - j)); + await Check.insertMany(checks); + console.log(`Monitor ${i}: ${Math.floor((j/10000) * 100)}% checks created`); + } } } catch (error) { console.error(error); + throw error; } };Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js (1)
74-75:⚠️ Potential issueDon't let invalid inputs throw off your rhythm!
When parsing page and rowsPerPage, if the inputs aren't valid numbers, parseInt can return NaN.
page = parseInt(page); rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); +if (isNaN(page)) page = 0; +if (isNaN(rowsPerPage)) rowsPerPage = 10;Also applies to: 143-144
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx (2)
Line range hint
31-71: Mom's spaghetti moment: Error handling needs some love!The error is being logged but not shown to the user. Consider adding user-friendly error messages and more granular loading states.
Here's a suggestion to improve error handling:
} catch (error) { logger.error(error); + // Show user-friendly error message + const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message || 'Failed to fetch incidents'; + // Add error state and display component + setError(errorMessage); } finally { setIsLoading(false); }
164-171: Straight fire pagination implementation! 🔥The new Pagination component integration is clean and well-structured. Just one tiny nitpick: consider making the "incidents" label configurable through props for better reusability.
- paginationLabel="incidents" + paginationLabel={paginationLabel}Server/db/models/Check.js (1)
16-21: Mom's spaghetti! We need some validation here!While adding teamId to the schema is good, consider adding required: true since every check should belong to a team.
teamId: { type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: "Team", immutable: true, index: true, + required: true, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx(5 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Incidents/index.jsx(3 hunks)Server/controllers/monitorController.js(2 hunks)Server/db/models/Check.js(2 hunks)Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js(4 hunks)Server/db/mongo/utils/seedDb.js(1 hunks)Server/validation/joi.js(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Server/controllers/monitorController.js
- Client/src/Pages/Incidents/index.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx (1)
27-28: Clean state management, my dude! 🔥Breaking down the pagination controller into separate state variables makes the code cleaner and easier to maintain. The standard page size of 10 is also more conventional.
Server/validation/joi.js (1)
134-134: Yo, these validation changes are tight!The dateRange validation has been consistently updated across all schemas to include "hour" and "all" options. This maintains schema consistency and aligns with the new aggregation pipeline requirements.
Also applies to: 169-169, 220-220, 291-291, 304-304
Server/db/models/Check.js (1)
79-80: These indexes are fire! 🔥The compound index on {teamId: 1, createdAt: -1} will optimize the new team-based queries with date filtering and sorting.
Server/db/mongo/modules/checkModule.js (2)
77-85: Yo dawg, I heard you like duplicated code!The matchStage construction is duplicated between getChecksByMonitor and getChecksByTeam. Let's DRY this up!
Extract the common logic into a reusable function:
+const buildMatchStage = (id, idField, dateRange) => ({ + [idField]: ObjectId.createFromHexString(id), + status: false, + ...(dateRangeLookup[dateRange] && { + createdAt: { + $gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange], + }, + }), +}); -const matchStage = { - monitorId: ObjectId.createFromHexString(monitorId), - status: false, - ...(dateRangeLookup[dateRange] && { - createdAt: { - $gte: dateRangeLookup[dateRange], - }, - }), -}; +const matchStage = buildMatchStage(monitorId, 'monitorId', dateRange);Also applies to: 147-155
115-132: These aggregation pipelines are straight fire! 🔥The use of $facet to get both count and paginated results in a single query is a performance win. Nice optimization!
Also applies to: 185-203
| const IncidentTable = ({ monitors, selectedMonitor, filter }) => { | ||
| import Pagination from "../../../Components/Table/TablePagination"; | ||
|
|
||
| const IncidentTable = ({ monitors, selectedMonitor, filter, dateRange }) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yo dawg, you forgot to validate the dateRange prop!
The dateRange prop is being used in the component but isn't included in the PropTypes validation. This could lead to some nasty runtime surprises!
Add the missing PropType validation like this:
IncidentTable.propTypes = {
monitors: PropTypes.object.isRequired,
selectedMonitor: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
filter: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+ dateRange: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
};Also applies to: 177-182
| let { sortOrder, dateRange, filter, page, rowsPerPage } = req.query; | ||
| page = parseInt(page); | ||
| rowsPerPage = parseInt(rowsPerPage); | ||
| console.log(dateRangeLookup[dateRange]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cleanup on aisle 5! We've got some debug code that needs wiping!
Remove the console.log statements before they end up in production.
-console.log(dateRangeLookup[dateRange]);
-console.log(matchStage);Also applies to: 156-156
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx (2)
44-60: Yo dawg, I heard you like duplicating code! Let's fix that! 🔄There's duplicate parameter handling between getChecksByTeam and getChecksByMonitor. We can make this cleaner!
+ const getChecksParams = { + authToken, + sortOrder: "desc", + limit: null, + dateRange, + filter, + page, + rowsPerPage, + }; if (selectedMonitor === "0") { res = await networkService.getChecksByTeam({ - authToken: authToken, - teamId: user.teamId, - sortOrder: "desc", - limit: null, - dateRange, - filter: filter, - page: page, - rowsPerPage: rowsPerPage, + ...getChecksParams, + teamId: user.teamId, }); } else { res = await networkService.getChecksByMonitor({ - authToken: authToken, - monitorId: selectedMonitor, - sortOrder: "desc", - limit: null, - dateRange, - filter: filter, - page, - rowsPerPage, + ...getChecksParams, + monitorId: selectedMonitor, }); }
Line range hint
133-135: These boolean names got me nervous, but I'm calm and ready! 🎯The boolean variable names are a bit confusing.
hasChecksis true when there are NO checks, which is counterintuitive.- const hasChecks = checks?.length === 0; - const noIncidentsRecordedYet = hasChecks && selectedMonitor === "0"; - const noIncidentsForThatMonitor = hasChecks && selectedMonitor !== "0"; + const isEmpty = checks?.length === 0; + const noTeamIncidents = isEmpty && selectedMonitor === "0"; + const noMonitorIncidents = isEmpty && selectedMonitor !== "0";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Incidents/IncidentTable/index.jsx (2)
182-182: Yo dawg, props to you for adding that dateRange PropType! 🙌You've addressed the previous review comment by adding the PropType validation for dateRange. That's what I'm talking about!
27-28: Mom's spaghetti approves this state management! 🍝Breaking down the pagination controller into atomic states makes the code cleaner and easier to maintain. Nice work!
| const handleChangeRowsPerPage = (event) => { | ||
| setRowsPerPage(event.target.value); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Knees weak when the page doesn't reset! 🤔
When changing rows per page, we should reset the page to 0 to avoid potential out-of-bounds issues.
const handleChangeRowsPerPage = (event) => {
setRowsPerPage(event.target.value);
+ setPage(0); // Reset to first page when changing rows per page
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const handleChangeRowsPerPage = (event) => { | |
| setRowsPerPage(event.target.value); | |
| }; | |
| const handleChangeRowsPerPage = (event) => { | |
| setRowsPerPage(event.target.value); | |
| setPage(0); // Reset to first page when changing rows per page | |
| }; |
This PR improves performance of the Incidents page by using the MongoDBs aggregation pipeline.
It also uses the standard pagination component for the incidents page