Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update analysis.TokenFrequency to use options #1522

Merged

Conversation

mschoch
Copy link
Contributor

@mschoch mschoch commented Dec 16, 2020

previously it used boolean, and future changes would
require additional booleans. using options directly
keeps the function signatures cleaner.

previously it used boolean, and future changes would
require additional booleans.  using options directly
keeps the function signatures cleaner.
@mschoch mschoch merged commit 3e034a5 into use-moved-indexing-options Dec 16, 2020
@mschoch mschoch deleted the update-token-frequencies-indexing-options branch December 16, 2020 22:13
mschoch added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2020
* use the moved indexing options

* update analysis.TokenFrequency to use options (#1522)

* update analysis.TokenFrequency to use options

previously it used boolean, and future changes would
require additional booleans.  using options directly
keeps the function signatures cleaner.

* update to latest apis
mschoch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2021
* refactor to remove circular deps

* reduce index and segment API surface area

* update Advanced() method (#1509)

* relocate store pkg inside upsidedown (#1510)

* remove Advanced() method from scorch (#1511)

* remove use of dump methods from index reader (#1516)

* remove remaining blevex imports (#1520)

* update analysis.TokenFrequency to use options (#1522)

* switch default index to scorch with latest zap (#1528)

* MatchOperator should be that type instead of int (#1410)

Co-authored-by: Sreekanth Sivasankaran <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mario de Frutos Dieguez <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants