-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed the sarif write failure #183
Conversation
Signed-off-by: naveensrinivasan <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for Docker image scanning in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/grype.yaml (2)
Line range hint
14-23
: Enhance the failure notification messageWhile the notification mechanism is well-implemented, the message could be more informative by including:
- The severity level that triggered the failure
- A link to the security documentation or remediation guidelines
Consider this enhanced message:
script: | github.rest.issues.createComment({ issue_number: context.issue.number, owner: context.repo.owner, repo: context.repo.repo, - body: '❌ Container security scan failed. Please check the workflow logs.' + body: '❌ Container security scan failed: Found vulnerabilities at or above HIGH severity.\n\n' + + 'Please:\n' + + '1. Check the workflow logs for detailed findings\n' + + '2. Review our [Security Guidelines](../security.md) for remediation steps' })🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 46-46: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
46-46
: Add newline at end of fileAdd a newline character at the end of the file to comply with YAML best practices.
severity-cutoff: high +
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 46-46: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/grype.yaml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/grype.yaml
[error] 46-46: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/grype.yaml (3)
Line range hint
8-12
: Well-configured concurrency settings!The concurrency configuration effectively prevents parallel runs and resource wastage while ensuring only the latest PR changes are scanned.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 46-46: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Line range hint
42-46
: Well-configured security scanning!The configuration appropriately:
- Uses pinned action versions for security
- Sets a reasonable severity cutoff
- Removes the problematic SARIF upload step that was causing failures
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 46-46: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Line range hint
1-46
: Verify security scan results are still accessibleWhile removing the SARIF upload fixes the workflow failure, please verify that security scan results are still accessible through:
- The workflow logs
- The new PR comment notification
Run this script to check recent workflow runs and comments:
✅ Verification successful
Security scan results remain accessible through workflow logs and notifications
The verification confirms:
- The workflow runs are properly executing and visible in GitHub Actions, showing both successful and failed runs
- The scan results are accessible through:
- GitHub Actions workflow logs (as evidenced by the workflow run history)
- Failure notifications via PR comments (the notification mechanism is properly configured in the workflow)
The removal of SARIF upload doesn't impact the visibility of scan results since:
- The workflow still fails on high severity findings (fail-build: true)
- Failed scans trigger a PR comment notification
- Full scan details remain available in the workflow logs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the visibility of security scan results # Check recent workflow runs gh run list --workflow=grype.yaml --limit 5 # Check if notifications are being created gh pr view 183 --json comments --jq '.comments[] | select(.body | contains("Container security scan failed"))'Length of output: 1098
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 46-46: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ |
Summary by CodeRabbit