-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
List LitecoinZ (LTZ) #2221
List LitecoinZ (LTZ) #2221
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NACK per comments
@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ private void onSaveNewAccount(PaymentAccount paymentAccount) { | |||
.useIUnderstandButton() | |||
.show(); | |||
break; | |||
case "LTZ": | |||
new Popup<>().information(Res.get("account.altcoin.popup.LTZ.msg", "LTZ")) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this message bring any added value at this point?
It duplicates validation error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you see messages are quite similar to ZEC but customized for LTZ:
account.altcoin.popup.LTZ.msg=When using {0} you can only use the transparent addresses (starting with L
) not the z-addresses (private), because the arbitrator would not be able to verify the transaction with z-addresses.
account.altcoin.popup.ZEC.msg=When using {0} you can only use the transparent addresses (starting with t
) not the z-addresses (private), because the arbitrator would not be able to verify the transaction with z-addresses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know, but still it doesn't add any value to repeat validation message.
I value your effort with all those translations.
Team will have to discuss if post save popups with this type of messages have any sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well the sense is to advice customers to use only transparent address and not z-address because they are not supported. Now, because LTZ use address starting with 'L' and not with 't' like ZEC does
Just a general comment on changing/adding translations. This only should be done in the English source file (displayStrings.properties) as all other translations are translated within Transifex and will be overwritten/updated before every release. |
@ripcurlx thanks for the info |
Please rebase on top of master and resolve the conflicts. |
Ready in a couple of hours. Hold on |
@blabno done. Please review my changes and merge this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK
Could you squash your commits into a single one?
Also it needs conflict resolution now, because of other merged assets. |
rebase and squash into a single commit |
@blabno squashed |
Thank you. Ready for merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
The aim of this PR is to list LitecoinZ (LTZ) on bisq.
This PR replace the previous #1910 closed by @ManfredKarrer
Regards,
Mark