Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] adding first BEP010 spec #118

Closed
wants to merge 86 commits into from

Conversation

choldgraf
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an attempt at adapting the BEP010 spec for this repository. There are probably a bunch of things to update, but it'd be helpful if I could get some high-level feedback on this one.

For example, I basically just tried to adapt word-for-word the google docs version. However, there's probably some redundant information with the base BIDS spec etc. Feel free to recommend sections to remove, move around, etc. Other than that, let me know what I should do. @chrisfilo do you have thoughts on this? Or can you ping somebody who went through this with the MEG spec?

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ Changelog

## [Unreleased](https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/tree/HEAD)

- Updating the specification per BEP010 - Extension for iEEG data
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is autogenerated from merged PRs. Please revert changes to it.

This specification extends the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) Specification for integration of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data, including both surface recordings (electrocorticography, ECoG), depth recordings, such as stereo EEG (sEEG), and recordings done with deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes. Most core principles of the original BIDS-fMRI and BIDS-MEG specifications are inherited by the iEEG specification, though some special considerations and additional fields are noted below.

Please refer to general BIDS specification document for context and general guidelines (definitions, units, directory structure, missing values, stimulus and event information, etc.).:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HFUkAEE-pB-angVcYe6pf_-fVf4sCpOHKesUvfb8Grc
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be a reference to a markownn file

Please refer to general BIDS specification document for context and general guidelines (definitions, units, directory structure, missing values, stimulus and event information, etc.).:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HFUkAEE-pB-angVcYe6pf_-fVf4sCpOHKesUvfb8Grc

The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to reiterate this

> TODO: citation

## Preliminary clarifications
This specification extends the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) Specification for integration of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data, including both surface recordings (electrocorticography, ECoG), depth recordings, such as stereo EEG (sEEG), and recordings done with deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes. Most core principles of the original BIDS-fMRI and BIDS-MEG specifications are inherited by the iEEG specification, though some special considerations and additional fields are noted below.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it's useful to use undefined terms such as fmri-bids, meg-bids etc.

@chrisgorgo
Copy link
Contributor

I pointed out some obvious sections with redundancy, but there are plenty of others. Especially referring to BIDS-fMRI, BIDS-MRI, BIDS-iEEG is confusing - those should be replaced with links to specific sections of the spec. You should check out #108 and #109 for inspiration.

PS I don't quite remember who did the reformatting and merging of MEG.

@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Collaborator

I think I was involved in merging of the MEG spec (although I was not the only one, I think Guio did most work). But that was taking snippets from a google doc and pasting them into another google doc (the main spec), which at that time was not yet so heavily visited and commented upon, so the main spec was a relatively clean document and the MEG changes quite overseeable.

I think that in this case we might want to have an intermediate version (which would become 1.1.2) to merge the current draft changes into the main spec. This is under the assumption that these are just formatting changes. And then we make a branch starting from that, which would become version 1.2 (including EEG and iEEG).

robertoostenveld and others added 21 commits January 11, 2019 08:49
@choldgraf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ok I think I've got the PR to your branch ready to go:

sappelhoff#5

Let me know how that looks and if I need to change anything up.

@choldgraf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

(ping @sappelhoff in case you're not receiving notifications about this)

@chrisgorgo chrisgorgo mentioned this pull request Jan 13, 2019
8 tasks
@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is to be closed, since the remaining work is now part of #108. See also
#108 (comment)

@sappelhoff sappelhoff closed this Jan 14, 2019
@Remi-Gau Remi-Gau added the BEP label Jul 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants