Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GSP-654: Unify List Behavior #654

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2021
Merged

GSP-654: Unify List Behavior #654

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2021

Conversation

JinnyYi
Copy link
Contributor

@JinnyYi JinnyYi commented Jul 9, 2021

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #654 (15c7900) into master (793dd83) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #654   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   17.57%   17.57%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         768      768           
=======================================
  Hits          135      135           
  Misses        626      626           
  Partials        7        7           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 17.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 793dd83...15c7900. Read the comment docs.

@JinnyYi JinnyYi changed the title Add unify list behavior GSP-654: Unify list behavior Jul 9, 2021
@JinnyYi JinnyYi changed the title GSP-654: Unify list behavior GSP-654: Unify List Behavior Jul 9, 2021
@Xuanwo Xuanwo requested review from a team July 9, 2021 11:58
@Xuanwo
Copy link
Contributor

Xuanwo commented Jul 12, 2021

ping @beyondstorage/go-storage-committer @beyondstorage/beyond-tp-maintainer @beyondstorage/go-storage-reviewer for another LGTM

@xxchan xxchan requested a review from zu1k July 12, 2021 16:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants