-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a missing safety invariant to System::run_unsafe
#7778
Merged
alice-i-cecile
merged 11 commits into
bevyengine:main
from
joseph-gio:system-world-unsoundness
Apr 17, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f9f7928
use safety invariants to validate the world
joseph-gio ac6ab96
fix safety invariants for parallel systems
joseph-gio d859112
fix safety invariants for run conditions
joseph-gio 8d33e13
make some phrasing more clear
joseph-gio 5f3a0c3
make a safety comment more precise
joseph-gio d968a99
add a safety invariant to `CombinatorSystem`
joseph-gio a62659a
remove unused `WorldId` from `ExclusiveFunctionSystem`
joseph-gio 3edc0e8
add a TODO
joseph-gio 699bd1e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into system-world-unsoun…
joseph-gio 846f912
clarify a comment
joseph-gio 6333985
fix a merge error
joseph-gio File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this meant to stay as a TODO?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. The previous "access is compatible" comment is incorrect, since it's not supported by any invariants in this function. I'd rather be explicit that these invariants aren't fully fleshed out yet than pretend that they are. I have a real fix for this in #8292.