-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CoC - Minor disagreement #3636
Comments
Hi @RWOverdijk! It looks like you didn’t follow the instructions fully when you created your issue. Please edit your comment (use the pencil icon at the top-right corner of the comment box) and fix the following issues:
As soon as those items are rectified, post a new comment (e.g. “Ok, fixed!”) below and we'll re-open this issue. Thanks! |
@sgress454 Staple your bot to a wall please. |
Hi @RWOverdijk! It looks like you didn’t follow the instructions fully when you created your issue. Please edit your comment (use the pencil icon at the top-right corner of the comment box) and fix the following issues:
As soon as those items are rectified, post a new comment (e.g. “Ok, fixed!”) below and we'll re-open this issue. Thanks! |
Negative, I am a meat popsicle. |
Hi @RWOverdijk! It looks like you didn’t follow the instructions fully when you created your issue. Please edit your comment (use the pencil icon at the top-right corner of the comment box) and fix the following issues:
As soon as those items are rectified, post a new comment (e.g. “Ok, fixed!”) below and we'll re-open this issue. Thanks! |
The issue is a discussion point about a document. How can I do any of these things? Please disable this bot. |
Hi @RWOverdijk! It looks like you didn’t follow the instructions fully when you created your issue. Please edit your comment (use the pencil icon at the top-right corner of the comment box) and fix the following issues:
As soon as those items are rectified, post a new comment (e.g. “Ok, fixed!”) below and we'll re-open this issue. Thanks! |
@RWOverdijk If you have a proposal as to how the code of conduct should be changed, you can make a PR to that document! |
@RWOverdijk I'll hit you up on gitter |
From the CODE-OF-CONDUCT:
There are some people that are unsure as to what this means exactly (including me). It's a very open for interpretation rule. I also think I know why this was added, but I still think it doesn't belong in the CoC. It should either be rephrased, or removed.
Actually, talking about rival projects is a good thing. It's used to learn, to educate yourself. Sure; just jumping in a channel and spamming "screw sails, use this other project" would be wrong. But mentioning a project shouldn't constitute for reason of exclusion, ever.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: