Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(its): add ITS message types #55

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024
Merged

feat(its): add ITS message types #55

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

AttissNgo
Copy link
Contributor

@AttissNgo AttissNgo commented Nov 6, 2024

AXE-6064

  • add ITS message types
  • add token manageger types
  • define ITS messages with Soroban types

- add ITS message types
- add token manageger types
- define ITS messages with Soroban types
@AttissNgo AttissNgo requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2024 15:32
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 98.66%. Comparing base (5ed9513) to head (af695b1).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
contracts/interchain-token-service/src/types.rs 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #55      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.12%   98.66%   -0.46%     
==========================================
  Files          24       25       +1     
  Lines        1940     1950      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         1923     1924       +1     
- Misses         17       26       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

- change TokenManagerType enum to have integer variants
@AttissNgo AttissNgo merged commit 9b62384 into main Nov 6, 2024
5 checks passed
@AttissNgo AttissNgo deleted the feat/its-message-types branch November 6, 2024 19:54
@ahramy ahramy mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants